No. 22-6399
Kerry Simpson v. Tom Watson, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure dna-evidence due-process judicial-reasoning legal-standard manifest-weight prejudice prejudice-standard standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Federal Appellate Court Apply the Correct Standard in the Determination of Prejudice?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Federal Appellate Court Apply the Correct Standard in the Determination of Prejudice? 2. Manifest Weight of the Evidence. : 3. Can a “Jurist of Reason” Ignore DNA Evidence?
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-04
Waiver of right of respondent Tom Watson to respond filed.
2022-10-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 26, 2023)
Attorneys
Kerry Simpson
Kerry Simpson — Petitioner
Tom Watson
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent