No. 19-1129

Charles T. Fote v. Andrei Iancu, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2020-03-16
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-procedure certiorari-petition civil-procedure court-of-appeals due-process judicial-opinion judicial-reasoning judicial-review legal-reasoning rehearing supervisory-authority written-opinion
Key Terms:
DueProcess Patent Trademark Privacy Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a court of appeals must provide an opinion explaining its reasoning in an appeal that involves a complex and unsettled area of the law and in which a written opinion would likely provide the appellant with a viable basis for seeking rehearing, rehearing en banc, or certiorari

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a court of appeals must provide an opinion explaining its reasoning in an appeal that involves a complex and unsettled area of the law and in which a written opinion would likely provide the appellant with a viable basis for seeking rehearing, rehearing en banc, or certiorari.

Docket Entries

2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 15, 2020)
2020-01-24
Application (19A821) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 11, 2020.
2020-01-21
Application (19A821) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 10, 2020 to March 11, 2020, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Charles T. Fote
William Robert PetersonMorgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Petitioner
William Robert PetersonMorgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent