Whether a U.S. Court of Appeals panel has unfettered discretion in every matter to withhold all indication of its reasons for ruling

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a U.S. Court of Appeals panel has unfettered discretion in every matter (outside of a small number of statutory exceptions) to withhold all indication of its reasons for ruling in a particular way without regard for consistency or resort to policy. ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Appeal No. 22-55273 Enrique Lozano, Plaintiff-Appellant and Mark D. Potter, Appellant v. Julio Yee Cabrera; Enrique Wong Vasquez, and William Anthony Adams, Appellee, and Beamspeed LLC, an Arizona Limited Liability Company; Does, 1-10, Defendants. Memorandum Opinion: March 7, 2023 Order Denying Motion for Attorney Fees: April 18, 2023 Order Denying Motion for Clarification, Modification, or Reconsideration: May 18, 2023 USS. District Court, Southern District of California Case No. 3:14-cv-00333 JAH-RBB Enrique Lozano, Plaintiff v. Julio Yee Cabrera and Enrique Wong Vasquez, Defendants. Order Granting Sanctions / Attorney Fees: March 2, 2022 Order Spreading the Mandate of the Ninth Circuit affirming in part, vacating in part, and remanding to the USDC: March 1, 2017 Order Denying Sanctions: October 5, 2016 Order Granting Sanctions: March 31, 2016 Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss: March 12, 2015 ili U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Appeal No. 15-55535, 16-55522 Enrique Lozano, Mark D. Potter, v. Julio Yee Cabrera and Enrique Wong Vasquez, Memorandum Opinion: February 7, 2017