No. 22-5317
Dora L. Adkins v. Merrifield Hotel Associates, LP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fourth-circuit-review judicial-reasoning standard-of-review standing summary-affirmance unpublished-opinion
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Erred in the Order, Dated, July 28, 2022
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Erred in the Order, Dated, July 28, 2022, when it “reviewed the record and found no reversible error and affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.” “Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dora L. Adkins v. Merrifield Hotel Associates, L.P., No 1:22-cv-399-AJT-IDD (E.D. Va. April 12, 2022 & April 13, 2022),” (Dkt. No. 11., Dkt. No. 12)). Pet.
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-09-24
Supplemental brief of petitioner Dora L. Adkins filed. (Distributed)
2022-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-08
Brief of respondent Merrifield Hotel Associates, LP in opposition filed.
2022-08-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 8, 2022)
Attorneys
Merrifield Hotel Associates, LP
David Drake Hudgins — Hudgins Law Firm, Respondent
David Drake Hudgins — Hudgins Law Firm, Respondent