No. 21-8015
Jeffrey Kinzle v. Eric Jackson
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure court-procedure due-process federal-courts federal-review habeas-corpus judicial-reasoning state-courts statutory-interpretation supreme-court
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a federal court may 'look through' to review the decision of an inferior court when the high court offers additional reasoning
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, under § 2254(d), a federal court may “look through” to review the decision of an inferior court when the high court offers additional reasoning explaining the court’s decision on the relevant claim. ii
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-14
Waiver of right of respondent Eric Jackson to respond filed.
2022-05-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2022)
Attorneys
Eric Jackson
Peter Benjamin Gonick — Attorney General of Washington, Respondent
Peter Benjamin Gonick — Attorney General of Washington, Respondent
Jeffrey Kinzle
Ann K. Wagner — Federal Public Defender Office, Petitioner
Ann K. Wagner — Federal Public Defender Office, Petitioner