Is THERE A "CONFLIT BF LAW" WHEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA MADE LAWS THAT UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VIOLATED THE STATUTORY PROHIBITIONS SET-FORTH IN ARTICLE 1 CLAUSE 1O, AND THEN PROCEEDED TO ENFORCE THE LAWS ON PETITIDNER AND OTHER DEFENDANTS IN SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES IN VIOLATION OF THE LEGAL SUPERIORITY OF THE UNITED STATE'S FEDERAL CONSTITUTION'S "SOVEREIGNTY" THAT IS OVER ANY CONFLICTING LAW OR STATE CONSTITUTION AS DECLARED BY THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE" FOUND IN ARTICLE G,CLAUSE 2

Is THERE A CONFLICT OF AUTHORITY " WHEN THE STATE OE CALIFORNIA MADE LAWS THAT UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VIOLATED THE STATUTORY PROHIBITIONS SET-FORTH IN ARTICLE 1CLAUSE 1O, AND THEN PROCEEDED TO ENFORCE THE LAWS ON PETITIDNER AND OTHER DEFENDANTS IN SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES IN VIOLATION OF THE LEGAL SUPERIORITY OF THE UNITED STATE'S FEDERAL CONSTITUTION'S "SOVEREIGNTY" THAT IS OVER ANY CONFLICTING LAW OR STATE CONSTITUTION AS DECLARED BY THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE" FOUND IN ARTICLE G,CLAUSE 2

2n CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF THE MATERIAL TERMS OF THE PLEA BARGAIN AGREEMENT, CENTRAL TO THIS CASE, HAS A CONNECTION TO TWO OR MORE JURISDICTIONS"?

④. IS THERE A "CONFLICT" BETWEEN STATE AUTHORITY AND FEDERAL IN SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES ?

Is there a conflict when the state of California exceeded the United States constitutional limitations found in Article 4, clause 10 unnecessarily, when the state was not confronted with an exigent circumstance, nor a state or national emergency that required the state to use its inherent reserved police power to amend a law or make a law that impairs the state's obligation to prior contracts with petitioner and other defendants in similar circumstances?