| 23-7169 |
Robert G. Pulley v. Daniel Paramo, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-04-10 |
Denied |
28-usc-2254(d)(2) aedpa-statute-of-limitations california-penal-code-section-198.5 habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel preliminary-hearing-testimony schlup-actual-innocence-exception state-procedural-default unreasonable-determination-of-fact unreasonable-determination-of-law |
what-constitutes-sufficient-evidence-to-overcome-the-presumption |
| 21-6649 |
Paul J. Hultman v. Daniel Paramo, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-12-17 |
Denied |
due-process evidentiary-hearing fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance juror-misconduct presumption-of-prejudice sixth-amendment |
Were the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments violated when a juror admitted viewing unadmitted evidence during deliberations and stated that her verdict w… |
| 20-7136 |
James Robert Stanford v. Daniel Paramo, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-02-16 |
Denied |
certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review miller-el-v-cockrell miller-v-cockrell pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-default |
Does the requisite 'substantial showing' require pro-se-litigants to re-submit supporting-documents |
| 20-5151 |
Antoine Reed v. Daniel Paramo, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-07-24 |
Denied |
appointed-counsel clear-error compulsory-process credibility federal-district-court material-witness police-manipulation procedural-bar standard-of-review state-law state-law-error |
Did the federal district court commit clear error when it deemed the Reed's properly presented 28 USC section 2254 compulsory process violation claim … |
| 19-7582 |
Raul Arellano v. Daniel Paramo, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-02-06 |
Denied |
circuit-court civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-review habeas-corpus judicial-procedure mailbox-rule ninth-circuit petition-reconsideration prisoner-rights standing |
Question not identified |
| 19-6467 |
Robert G. Pulley v. Daniel Paramo, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-10-31 |
Denied |
actual-innocence due-process federal-court federal-habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miscarriage-of-justice procedural-default state-court |
Whether the actual innocence exception to the procedural default doctrine applies to excuse the petitioner's failure to raise certain claims in state … |
| 19-5650 |
James Michael Williams v. Daniel Paramo, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-08-20 |
Denied |
brady-violations certificate-of-appealability due-process fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel preliminary-hearing prosecutorial-misconduct second-jury-trial |
Whether the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals erred in denying Certificate of Appealability to Petitioner |
| 19-147 |
Michael Baraka Mason v. Daniel Paramo, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-08-01 |
Denied |
certificate-of-appealability federalism-and-comity habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel merits-based-standard merits-standard plainly-meritless procedural-complexity reasonable-probability reasonable-probability-of-different-outcome rhines-stay |
Whether a habeas petitioner who seeks a Rhines stay to exhaust a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel must establish a 'reasonable probability o… |
| 18-9847 |
Lawrence J. Petitta v. Daniel Paramo, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-06-27 |
Denied |
civil-rights constitutional-limitations contract-clause contract-rights due-process federal-preemption federal-supremacy jurisdictional-conflict plea-bargain police-power sovereign-authority state-authority state-law supremacy-clause |
Is there a conflict when the state of California exceeded the United States constitutional limitations found in Article 4, clause 10 unnecessarily, wh… |
| 18A1237 |
James Michael Williams v. Daniel Paramo, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-05-30 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 18A1196 |
Michael Baraka Mason v. Daniel Paramo, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-05-20 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 18-9004 |
Vaughn S. Archer v. Daniel Paramo, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-04-29 |
Denied |
boykin-advisement criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining right-to-trial sentencing sentencing-reduction statutory-interpretation statutory-reduction trial-court-advisement |
Whether Archer knowingly and voluntarily entered into a guilty plea where the trial court failed to advise him as to the potential application of a st… |
| 18-7223 |
Jesse Lloyd Hall v. Daniel Paramo, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-01-03 |
Denied |
28-usc-2254 barefoot-standard coerced-confession due-process federal-review habeas-corpus police-misconduct recantation state-writ-petition victim-recantation victim-rights witness-intimidation |
Whether federal courts must take the allegations of a state writ petition as true when weighing if the state's denial was objectively unreasonable |
| 18-6805 |
Jose Rodriguez v. Daniel Paramo, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-11-26 |
Denied |
abuse-of-discretion constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-question first-degree-murder ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel insufficient-evidence jury-instructions penal-code-187a principal reasonable-doubt |
Whether the petitioner's conviction for first-degree murder lacked sufficient evidence to support the verdict |
| 18-6414 |
Marvin K. Locke v. Daniel Paramo, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-25 |
Denied |
common-law constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process felony-murder habeas-corpus ninth-circuit procedural-default second-successive-petition standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether the second-degree felony murder rule is based on statute |
| 18-5087 |
Peter Wilson v. Daniel Paramo, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-07-02 |
Denied |
aedpa civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-law free-speech habeas-corpus standing state-prisoners statute-of-limitations |
Whether the one-year statute of limitations under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) violates due process by depriving state pr… |