Question not identified

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED eee M estion iS s_ Feoo§ of : (1) Pevson mai (2) Prisomer declerccrtion G) officer | who Cece) Document from Risoaer Sor mailing knowledsemenT of ceiving documents, Gre This 3 SufFeG enT Sudeace To Satis fy “the Prison Mailbox Rule Announced in(Houston v. Lack MST US. 266 270 0i988) o¢ is act as now Ninth Ciccuit Announced tn This CureeaT Case” ; ——Ta_my Metion For recondiberation dete} Tl 2014 IL Cited (Dd, gla; v. Moelle S67 EId (63 (qth Cie 2009) an) CHoszac_y. Cacey 273 E.3) 1220 (4 Cie 2o01\ This 2 Cases Supgected The SacT Thal Usosiny Vi kel, does Apely on Crccumilances as in my Care. he FacTs Ove hasitelly Stated on my Mol Gor ctdons eration Exhibit E\. Such Ciccumilances sey “thei asloag as flaintifF pcciedts a5 evidence huis oun declacdhion anal his Privo Log Numbers Cevealing dife Mail was given “te officer fee Merle oul it shoul be suffi cieal fee Document To be Case Glal kvenThogh cheymenTs never make it To. Covel. ; I a