No. 19-1067

Neal N. Browder, et al. v. S. R. Nehad, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-02-28
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: civil-rights deadly-force due-process emergency-response fourth-amendment law-enforcement police-conduct police-shooting qualified-immunity use-of-force
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Ninth Circuit err in denying qualified immunity to a police officer who responded to a midnight emergency call about a suspect threatening others with a knife, encountered that suspect in a dark alley walking towards him holding a metallic object within seconds upon arriving at the scene, and used deadly force?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Shortly before midnight on April 29, 2015, a bookstore clerk saw Fridoon Rawshan Nehad in an alley. Nehad, who was incoherent, pulled a knife out of his backpack and said he was going to kill people. Nehad lunged at the clerk with the five-inch knife, but did not stab him. Nehad later went into the bookstore and said, at least five more times to the same bookstore clerk, that he was going to hurt or kill people. After Nehad left, the clerk called 911. A San Diego police dispatcher assigned this “hot call” the highest priority and informed officers there was a man threatening people with a knife. San Diego Police Officer Neal Browder responded to the emergency call. Pulling into a nearby alley only minutes later, Officer Browder saw Nehad and confirmed the suspect’s description from the call. Officer Browder got out of his patrol car and saw Nehad walking towards him with a metallic and shiny object held in a pointed fashion. As Nehad moved towards Officer Browder, Officer Browder fired his weapon. The total time from Officer Browder’s arrival to the time he fired his weapon was 33 seconds. Nehad’s parents and estate sued to recover damages for Nehad’s death, but the District Court found that Officer Browder enjoyed qualified immunity from suit and granted the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the District Court’s order. Did the Ninth Circuit err in denying qualified immunity to a police officer who responded to a midnight emergency call about a suspect threatening i others with a knife, encountered that suspect in a dark alley walking towards him holding a metallic object within seconds upon arriving at the scene, and used deadly force? ii

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-20
Reply of petitioners Neal Browder, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-07-07
Brief of respondents S.R. Nehad, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-04-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 7, 2020.
2020-04-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 8, 2020 to July 7, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-04-08
Response Requested. (Due May 8, 2020)
2020-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-27
Brief amici curiae of California State Association of Counties and the League of California Cities filed.
2020-03-26
Waiver of right of respondent S.R. Nehad, et al. to respond filed.
2020-02-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 30, 2020)
2020-01-21
Application (19A677) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 28, 2020.
2020-01-16
Application (19A677) to extend further the time from January 29, 2020 to February 28, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2019-12-17
Application (19A677) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 29, 2020.
2019-12-13
Application (19A677) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 31, 2019 to January 29, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

California State Association of Counties and the League of California Cities
Lee Harris RoistacherDaley & Heft, LLP, Amicus
Neal Browder, et al.
George Frederick SchaeferSan Diego City Attorney's Office, Petitioner
S.R. Nehad, et al.
Jennifer Mira HashmallMiller Barondess, LLP, Respondent