No. 19-1089

Lisa Gindi v. New York City Department of Education, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2020-03-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process education eeoc-procedures employment employment-discrimination free-speech school-safety special-education standing student-discipline title-vii workplace-retaliation
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA Immigration EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2020-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a failure to recognize the current IEP which allow the coddling of the very dangerous kids who are a threat to teachers and other students?

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : I. Question: Whether a failure to recognize the current IEP which allow the coddling of the very dangerous kids who are a threat to teachers and other students? : II Question: Is there a need for the times an employee files a new or amended charge alleging retaliation with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) before filing suit under Title VII’s antiretaliation provision if the employer’s act of retaliation is a result of the employee’s filing of an earlier charge with the EEOC? And, whether Federal district court filings were an oversight, more specifically, regarding Petitioner’s 2013, 2014/2015, and 2016 EEOC Right To Sue letters by the district and appeals court? Til. Question: Whether new jurisdiction regarding FEMLA was an oversight, that could have affected , employees’ court cases who were victims of domestic violence? And, was there an oversight in the amended law regarding stalking that could have, more specifically, affected the Petitioner’s case? 2 . 2 . IV Question: Whether harm will be caused by allowing retaliation/firing of an employee who reported to the boss to be a victim of family violence by an illegal immigrant who received voluntary deportation, as, in essence, could come back to America, one day, to hurt that fired employee, ex-spouse, again? V. Question: Which court has jurisdiction to amend ; present laws to "try" employers for criminal charges and receive jail time, if guilty, instead of civil charges who assault staff and employees physically, mentally and sexually, etc., instead of making it a "harassment" charge that is civil in nature? Especially, if the : employee did everything in his/her power to address issues of work-stress by seeking and paying for weekly, professional, outside help? VI. Question: Whether harm was caused by both courts concerning not finding merit in a case that 3 1 3 reported a student had in his possession a second category weapon? . VII. Question: Which court is designated to hear cases filed that question a need to dismantle a failed Department of Education and/or a failed teachers’ union that neither . has aided school report cards, nor school safety, nor have they granted employees their constitutional rights? VIII. Question: Which court amends laws for disabled : employees to add Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD ) to the list for female employees workers that is often accompanied by severe pain, mood issues, anxiety . and depression, so these employees diagnosed with such could be granted two, consecutive sick days without being docked pay and could be refrained from being deemed "unfit" for duty and/or forcing them to get a fitness test? 4 4

Docket Entries

2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-09
Waiver of right of respondent New York City Department of Education to respond filed.
2019-12-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 6, 2020)

Attorneys

Lisa Gindi
Lisa Gindi — Petitioner
Lisa Gindi — Petitioner
New York City Department of Education
Zachary S. ShapiroJames E. Johnson, Esq., Corporation Counsel of the CIty of New York, Respondent
Zachary S. ShapiroJames E. Johnson, Esq., Corporation Counsel of the CIty of New York, Respondent