No. 19-1210
Harry's Nurses Registry, et al. v. Claudia Gayle, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-enforcement condition-precedent employment-law fair-labor-standards-act private-right-of-action section-206 section-207 section-216(b) statutory-interpretation wage-and-hour
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA WageAndHour Privacy
Arbitration ERISA WageAndHour Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-05-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the finding that the employer has violated Section 206 or Section 207 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et. seq, a condition precedent that must occur before an employee's private right of action is triggered under Section 216(b)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Is the finding that the employer has violated Section 206 or Section 207 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et. seq, a condition precedent that must occur before an employee’s private right of action is triggered under Section 216(b)?
Docket Entries
2020-05-26
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-04-29
Waiver of right of respondent Claudia Gayle, et al. to respond filed.
2020-04-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Claudia Gayle, et al.
Jonathan Adam Bernstein — Meenan & Associates, LLC, Respondent
Jonathan Adam Bernstein — Meenan & Associates, LLC, Respondent
Harry's Nurses Registry, Harry Dorvilier
Michael James Confusione — Hegge & Confusione, Petitioner
Michael James Confusione — Hegge & Confusione, Petitioner