Whether School District of Philadelphia discharged the petitioner from his teaching position without due process of law

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether School District of Philadelphia discharged the petitioner from his teaching position without due. process of law when respondent denied the petitioner a hearing in violation of the — Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Whether respondent School District of Philadelphia acted with active connivance in the making ; of the state law violation false reports and other conduct amounting to official discrimination Clearly sufficient to constitute denial of riights protected by the Equal Protection Clause to : deprive the petitioner of his teaching position without due process of law in violation of the : Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit acted with active connivance in the making of the unauthorized appeal false reports and other conduct amounting to official discrimination clearly sufficient to constitute denial of rights proteced by the Equal Protection’ Clause to dismiss petitioner's motion for relief, pursuant to Rule 27(a}(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. : Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit abridge petitioner's fundamantal rights to access the court when respondent restricted petitioner to one (1) filing per year for relief in violation of the federal constitution and laws of the United States from a constitutional violation without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Whether respondent United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied the petitioner total access in the court in direct explicit to the Constitution of the United States. Whether respondent United States Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit's surcharge of $100.00 satisfy due process of law. Whether respondent United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit acted with reckless ; indifference and wanton disregards for the truth of falsity and the rights of petitioner and other when respondent acted with active connivance in the making of the required district court certification false reports and other conduct amounting to official discrrimination clearly sufficient to constitute denial of rights protected by the Equal Protection Clause to dismiss/deny petitioner's civil rights lawsuit without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth : ‘Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. ii PROCEEDINGS AND RELATED CASES All the parties appear in the caption of the case are on the cover page. : RELATED CASES Armstrong vs. School District of Philadelphia, No 2:99-cv-00825. In The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judgment entered December 23, ; 2019. a. Armstrong vs. School District of Philadelphia, No. 20-1199. United States Court of : Appeals For the Third Circuit. Judgment entered March 30, 2020 There is no parent or publicly held company owing 10% or more TABLE OF CONTENT Questions presented vel Disclosure statement Tabie of content c