No. 19-1267
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd. v. George Bell, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split civil-procedure control judicial-interpretation legal-standing litigation-control non-party preclusion preclusion-doctrine rigid-test rigid-two-part-test totality-of-circumstances
Key Terms:
DueProcess ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 'control' is assessed based on the totality of the circumstances, as seven courts of appeals have held, or using a rigid two-part test, as four courts of appeals have held
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Federal law permits someone to be subject to preclusion when they have exercised “control” over a lawsuit, even if they were not formally a party to it. Taylor v. Sturgell, 553 U.S. 880, 895 (internal quotation marks omitted). The question presented is whether “control” is assessed based on the totality of the circumstances, as seven courts of appeals have held, or using a rigid two-part test, as four courts of appeals have held. (i)
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-15
Waiver of right of respondents George Bell, et al. to respond filed.
2020-05-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 4, 2020)
2020-03-04
Application (19A971) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 1, 2020.
2020-03-02
Application (19A971) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 1, 2020 to May 1, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd.
Jessica Lynn Ellsworth — Hogan Lovells US, LLP, Petitioner
George Bell, et al.
Joseph John Tabacco Jr. — Berman Tabacco, Respondent