Whether the court of appeals erred in dismissing the appeal pursuant to an invalid appeal waiver

QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN DISMISSING THE APPEAL PURSUANT TO AN INVALID APPEAL WAIVER, AFTER MAKNG ERRONEOUS FINDINGS, OVERLOOKING AND MISAPPREHENDING PRECEDENTIAL LAW, IN AN EFFORT TO CIRCUMVENT THE HOLDING IN DAVIS, THAT THE RESIDUAL CLAUSE OF 18 U.S.C. § 924(¢) IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE, APPLYING THE FORCE CLAUSE OF 924(c) IN ORDER TO FIND THAT HOBBS ACT ROBBERY CONSTITUTES A CRIME OF VIOLENCE.