No. 19-135

Pamela J. Smith v. University of Maryland, Baltimore, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-30
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 1991-civil-rights-act 42-usc-1981 adverse-employment-action civil-rights employment mcdonongh-v-smith retaliation statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether retaliation claims under 42 U.S.C. §1981 should accrue at the date of the adverse employment action or the date when the adverse employment decision was communicated to the employee

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in McDonough v. Smith, 588 US _ (2019) and the Civil Rights Act of 1991, retaliation claims under 42 U.S.C. §1981 should accrue at the date of the adverse employment action as opposed to the date when the adverse employment decision was communicated to the employee? 2) Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in affirming the District Court’s decision dismissing Ms. Smith’s 42 U.S.C. §1981 claims as time-barred? li LIST OF ALL PARTIES Plaintiff-appellant below, who is the petitioner before this Court, is Pamela J. Smith. The below and respondents before this Court are the University of Maryland Baltimore, John Jensen (individual capacity) and Glosenda Navales (individual capacity).

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-06
Waiver of right of respondents University of Maryland, Baltimore, et al. to respond filed.
2019-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 29, 2019)

Attorneys

Pam Smith
Morris Eli FischerMorris Fischer, LLC, Petitioner
University of Maryland, Baltimore, et al.
Lillian L. ReynoldsMaryland Office of the Attorney General, Respondent