No. 19-144

James Thomas Ryan v. Department of Defense

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-31
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process employment federal-circuit federal-circuit-court-of-appeals federal-employment merit-systems-protection-board notice-and-opportunity personnel-action whistleblower-protection
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can the government sustain a specification without giving the employee notice?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : James Ryan, the Petitioner, request this Petition for Writ of Certiorari be granted because the personnel : : action violated his constitutional right to due process, as well as the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA). ; Petitioner was not provided with notice and opportunity to respond to a specification within a personnel action ; that removed him from employment as a police officer in the federal service. Additionally, the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) Administrative Judge did not analyze whether the Agency would have taken the personnel action absent disclosures protected by the \ ; WPA. The case should have been remanded by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) to the MSPB. 1) Can the government sustain a specification without ; giving the employee notice? 2) Can the government overcome a whistleblower defense without an objective test?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-21
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Defense to respond filed.
2019-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2019)

Attorneys

Department of Defense
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
James T. Ryan
James Ryan — Petitioner
James Ryan — Petitioner