No. 19-186

Leslie Moore Mira v. Argus Media, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2019-08-12
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights discrimination employment-discrimination employment-law hostile-work-environment nonconsensual-dissemination prima-facie prima-facie-case title-vii workplace-harassment
Key Terms:
EmploymentDiscrimina Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does such misconduct by an employer constitute a Title VII violation and create a prima facie hostile and discriminatory workplace?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED An estimated 10 million or 4% of US internet users have been threatened with or experienced the posting of explicit intimate images without their consent. The consequences for the subject can devastate dnd create extreme emotional distress. Forty-five states and Washington, DC, have enacted or proposed laws penalizing the nonconsensual dissemination of sexually graphic images. Questions presented are: ; Does such misconduct by an employer constitute a Title VII violation and create a prima facie hostile and discriminatory workplace? Did the Second Circuit and district court err in case dismissal?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-14
Waiver of right of respondents Argus Media, et al. to respond filed.
2019-05-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 11, 2019)
2019-04-11
Application (18A1049) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until May 23, 2019.
2019-04-08
Application (18A1049) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 18, 2019 to May 23, 2019, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.

Attorneys

Argus Media, et al.
Jeanne C. BarenholtzGarvey Schubert Barer, Respondent
Jeanne C. BarenholtzGarvey Schubert Barer, Respondent
Leslie M. Mira
Leslie Moore Mira — Petitioner
Leslie Moore Mira — Petitioner