Whether a crucial mandate of the international extradition treaty was violated

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. WHETHER A CRUCIAL MANDATE OF THE INTERNATIONAL EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND HONDURAS WAS VIOLATED WHEN THE PROSECUTION AT TRIAL PRESENTED EVIDENCE AGAINST THE DEFENDANT OF ACTS WHICH OCCURRED BEFORE THE DATE ALLOWED BY THE LANGUAGE OF THE TREATY. Il. WHETHER PETITIONER’S RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS AND A FAIR TRIAL WERE VIOLATED WHEN THE TRIAL COURT ALLOWED THE ADMISSION OF HEARSAY EVIDENCE SUGGESTING THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS INVOLVED IN AN UNRELATED MURDER OF WHICH HE HAD NO PARTICIPATION IN VIOLATION OF FRE 403 AND FRE 404(B).