| 25-5906 |
Alfredo Ramon Cerda v. W. Z. Jenkins, II, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-10-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights extradition-treaty international-law mexico-us-relations speedy-trial treaty-interpretation |
Whether the government is prohibited from extraditing a person to Mexico under Article 7 of the U.S. Mexico Extradition Treaty, when the prosecution f… |
| 25-5332 |
Francisco Melgar Cabrera v. Christian Lepe, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-08-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-procedure-act detention-review extradition-treaty federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus statutory-interpretation |
WHETHER: EXTRADITION TREATY VIOLATIONS
ARE COGNIZABLE UNDER 28 USC §2241(c)(3)
RATHER THAN UNDER §2255(a); A PERSON HELD
IN CUSTODY IN VIOLATION OF A… |
| 24-550 |
Tahawwur Hussain Rana v. W. Z. Jenkins, II |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-11-15 |
Denied |
|
circuit-split criminal-law double-jeopardy extradition-treaty international-law treaty-interpretation |
Whether the term 'offense' in the double jeopardy provision of extradition treaties refers to underlying conduct or elements of crimes |
| 23-7203 |
Vladimir Blasko v. Lasha Boyden, Acting United States Marshal for the Eastern District of California |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-04-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
district-court-role extradition extradition-treaty foreign-state-law judicial-interpretation requesting-state-law statute-of-limitations treaty-interpretation treaty-obligations treaty-provisions |
When must a district court interpret and apply a requesting state's statute of limitations in an extradition proceeding? |
| 22-453 |
Hyuk Kee Yoo, aka Keith Yoo v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2022-11-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
extradition-proceedings extradition-treaty individual-liberty judicial-discretion judiciary-role limitations-provisions statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent treaty-interpretation |
Whether interpreting Article 6 of the U.S.-South Korea Extradition Treaty as a discretionary issue for the Secretary of State conflicts with Supreme C… |
| 22-5295 |
Nizar Trabelsi, aka Nizar Ben Abdelaziz Trabelsi, aka Abu Qa'Qa v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2022-08-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
burden-of-proof criminal-prosecution due-process extradition-treaty foreign-court-rulings judicial-deference ministerial-determination prior-prosecution willful-blindness |
Whether a trial court should defer to a foreign nation's determination of an extradition treaty violation or make its own findings |
| 21-1378 |
Joaquin Archivaldo Guzman Loera v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2022-04-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
compulsory-process due-process extradition-treaty pretrial-restraints right-to-counsel sovereign-immunity standing standing-doctrine |
Whether individuals have standing to assert violations of an extradition treaty |
| 20-5556 |
Genaro Edgar Espinosa Dorantes v. Kevin Genovese, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-09-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
§2254-case civil-rights due-process equitable-tolling extradition extradition-treaty habeas-corpus language-barrier mexican-national |
Did the District Court Err Or Abuse Its Discretion in a § 2254 case When It Denied Equitable Tolling To A Mexican National, Unable To Speak Or Underst… |
| 19-394 |
Sergio Mejia-Duarte v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-09-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
criminal-procedure due-process extradition-treaty fair-trial federal-rules-of-evidence fre-403 fre-404(b) hearsay-evidence international-extradition international-law treaty unrelated-murder |
Whether a crucial mandate of the international extradition treaty was violated |
| 18-542 |
John E. Hamilton v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-10-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
charging criminal-procedure defendant-standing due-process extradition extradition-treaty international-law punishment rule-of-specialty sentencing standing treaty treaty-interpretation |
Whether an individual defendant has standing to assert a rule of specialty violation |