Did the CAFC, District Court, 10th Cir., TTAB orders and judgments and referenced Supreme Court rulings—that required corporations to be represented by legal counsel in court rooms—violate the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process of Law and; should these Supreme Court rulings be amended or over-turned so to conform with the Equal Protection Clause? If so, should the CAFC, District Court, 10th Cir., TTAB decisions be overturned?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the CAFC, District Court, 10th Cir., TTAB : . . Orders and Judgments and referenced Supreme Court rulings—that required corporations to be represented by legal counsel in court rooms—violate the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process of Law and; should these Supreme Court rulings be amended or over-turned so to conform with the Equal Protection . Clause? If so, should the CAFC, District Court, 10th . Circuit, TTAB decisions be overturned? 2. Did the Dist. Court, 10th Cir. and CAFC exclude cumulative evidence, ignore Supreme Court rulings, . U.S. Codes and Fed. R. Civ. P. in a prejudicial, bias . and erroneously manner so to meet abuse of discretion ; standards? If so, should a retrial be granted in the pro: per venue? 3. Did the Dist. Court violate the 5th & 14th Amendments when it ruled that the Petitioner “is : enjoined from using” the domain name? : 4. Owning to the errors of law committed by the CAFC, Dist. Court, 10th Cir. and TTAB and the preponderance of evidence and referenced SC rulings, should the trademark ‘sport court’ be cancelled and : remove from the trademark Registry? ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS BELOW : The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit USCA No. 2019-1156 James J. Maksimuk v. ; ; Connor Sport Court International, LLC . May 13, 2019 (Judgment Affirmed) : July 15, 2019 (Petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc denied) United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark ; Trial and Appeal Board Cancellation No. 92066311 ; James J. Maksimuk v. Connor Sport Court International, LLC June 22, 2018 (Decision Entered)