No. 19-5111
Avery Blodgett v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-U.S.C.-§2113 18-U.S.C.-§924(c)(3) 18-usc-2113 18-usc-924c3 crime-of-violence federal-bank-robbery force-clause johnson-precedent johnson-v-united-states retroactivity statutory-interpretation welch-v-united-states
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. §2113 is a categorical crime-of-violence under the force-clause of 18-U.S.C.-§924(c)(3)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW : 1. Whether federal bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. §2113 is a categorical | ; “crime of violence” under the force clause of 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)? | . 2. Whether the new rule of constitutional law set out in Johnson v. United | States and held to be retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review by this | , _ Court in Welch v. United States applies to the definition of “crime of violence” in the | residual clause of 18 U.S.C. §924(¢)(3)? | | i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-07-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 8, 2019)
Attorneys
Avery Blodgett
Judith H. Mizner — Federal Defender Office, Petitioner
Judith H. Mizner — Federal Defender Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent