No. 19-5115

Cordero Robert Seals v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof burrage burrage-test but-for-causation causation-standard causation-test circuit-split contributing-causation contributing-cause eighth-circuit government-burden judicial-interpretation legal-standard seventh-circuit
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Eighth Circuit misinterpreted the but-for causation test in light of the government's burden, and inappropriately applied the contributing causation test rejected by this Court in Burrage

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. WHETHER THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT MISINTERPRETED THE BUT-FOR CAUSATION TEST IN LIGHT OF THE GOVERNMENT’S BURDEN, AND INAPPROPRIATELY APPLIED THE CONTRIBUTING CAUSATION TEST REJECTED BY THIS COURT IN BURRAGE? II. WHETHER IN DOING SO, THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT'S OPINION IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT'S DECISION IN GAYLORD V. UNITED STATES? III. WHETHER THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT'S ALTERNATIVE HOLDING MISINTERPRETED BURRAGE AND APPLIED AN ERRONEOUS SPECIAL RULE OF INDEPENDENTLY SUFFICIENT CAUSE? ll

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-18
Waiver of right of respondent United Staets of America to respond filed.
2019-07-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 8, 2019)

Attorneys

Cordero Seals
Clemens A. ErdahlNidey, Peterson, Erdahl & Tindal Law Firm, Petitioner
Clemens A. ErdahlNidey, Peterson, Erdahl & Tindal Law Firm, Petitioner
United Staets of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent