No. 19-5130

Tammie McConico v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-courts circumstantial-evidence equal-protection federal-circuit-courts reasonable-doubt sixth-amendment standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Amendment requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, even in a circumstantial case?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Sixth Amendment requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, even in a circumstantial case? And whether the Equal Protections Clause is violated when there is a conflict amongst the federal circuit courts of appeal dealing with what the standard of review is when reviewing circumstantial evidence cases? i

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2019)

Attorneys

Tammie McConico
Rachael Elizabeth ReeseO'Brien Hatfield, P.A., Petitioner
Rachael Elizabeth ReeseO'Brien Hatfield, P.A., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent