No. 19-5130
Tammie McConico v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-courts circumstantial-evidence equal-protection federal-circuit-courts reasonable-doubt sixth-amendment standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, even in a circumstantial case?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Sixth Amendment requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, even in a circumstantial case? And whether the Equal Protections Clause is violated when there is a conflict amongst the federal circuit courts of appeal dealing with what the standard of review is when reviewing circumstantial evidence cases? i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Tammie McConico
Rachael Elizabeth Reese — O'Brien Hatfield, P.A., Petitioner
Rachael Elizabeth Reese — O'Brien Hatfield, P.A., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent