No. 19-5172

Jesus Hilario-Bello v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924c crime-of-violence due-process economic-loss fair-trial hobbs-act intangible-asset judicial-intervention physical-force statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Takings FifthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-11-01
Related Cases: 19-5114 (Vide) 19-5308 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Hobbs Act robbery is not a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. §924(c) because it can be committed without using physical force, by causing the victim to fear economic loss to an intangible asset

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether Hobbs Act robbery is not a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. §924(c) because it can be committed without using physical force, by causing the victim to fear economic loss to an intangible asset. Whether the trial Judge’s overt indication to the jury that his presence at the trial would influence the cooperating witnesses to tell the truth, and his other partial interventions and interruptions throughout the trial, violated the constitutional rights to a fair trial and due process of law? i

Docket Entries

2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-07-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 14, 2019)

Attorneys

Jesus Hilario-Bello
Lawrence Stern — Petitioner
Lawrence Stern — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent