No. 19-5258
IFP
Tags: 60(b)(6) change-in-decisional-law change-in-law civil-procedure constitutional-relief decisional-law due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure habeas-corpus relief rule-60(b) search-and-seizure sixth-amendment standing
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) be available to habeas corpus petitioners when a change in decisional law occurs?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED : I. Should relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) be made available to habeas corpus petitioners when a change in decisional law occurs? ; : Il. Is Rule 60(b) relief warranted where Morris’s conviction was based upon an ; unconstitutional search and seizure under Carpenter v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018)? Ill. Is Rule 60(b) relief warranted when counsel violated the Sixth Amendment by failing to allow Morris to choose the objective of the defense? : ii . . “PF . eo '
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 19, 2019)