| 23-1206 |
Elite IT Partners, Inc., dba Elite IT Home, et al. v. Federal Trade Commission |
Tenth Circuit |
2024-05-09 |
Denied |
|
change-in-law civil-procedure consent-judgment decisional-law equitable-monetary-relief equitable-relief federal-trade-commission injunctive-relief rule-60(b)(6) |
Whether Rule-60(b)(6) relief based on a post-judgment change in decisional law is categorically unavailable |
| 23-704 |
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-12-29 |
Denied |
|
civil-contempt civil-procedure contempt decisional-law equitable-remedies federal-trade-commission ftc-act permanent-injunction rule-60(b)(6) sanctions |
Can a fundamental change in decisional law independently support relief from a judgment under Rule 60(b)(6)? |
| 19-7645 |
Ramiro F. Gonzales v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-02-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review circuit-split civil-procedure decisional-law due-process extraordinary-circumstances federal-courts federal-rules gonzalez-v-crosby rule-60(b)(6) rule-60b6 split-among-circuits standing supreme-court-precedent |
Whether a change in decisional law may constitute an extraordinary circumstance justifying relief under Rule 60(b)(6) |
| 19-649 |
N. E. L., et al. v. Monica Gildner, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-11-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
4th-amendment child-custody civil-rights decisional-law due-process fourth-amendment jurisdiction post-removal-hearing post-seizure-hearing qualified-immunity uccjea |
Were Colorado's UCCJEA requirements detailed enough to defeat qualified immunity in a Fourth Amendment claim arising from the denial of a post-seizure… |
| 19-5258 |
Ernest Morris v. Pennsylvania |
Third Circuit |
2019-07-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
60(b)(6) change-in-decisional-law change-in-law civil-procedure constitutional-relief decisional-law due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure habeas-corpus relief rule-60(b) search-and-seizure sixth-amendment standing |
Should relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) be available to habeas corpus petitioners when a change in decisional law occurs? |