No. 19-5306

Born Murray v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights detention fourth-amendment investigation investigative-detention law-enforcement reasonable-suspicion seizure time-frame traffic-stop
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Where a police officer admittedly abandons the initial basis for a traffic stop to pursue a new investigation unsupported by reasonable suspicion, does the continued detention of a citizen violate the Fourth Amendment, even though the officer is within the 'time frame' of pursuing and dispelling the initial basis for the stop?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Where a police officer admittedly abandons the initial basis for a traffic stop to pursue a new investigation unsupported by reasonable suspicion, does the continued detention of a citizen violate the Fourth Amendment, even though the officer is within the “time frame” of pursuing and dispelling the initial basis for the stop? ii

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)

Attorneys

Born Murray
Kevin Michael SchadOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Michael SchadOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent