Whether defendants who have known about petitioner's disabilities status, but were intentionally indifferent and exploited the impairment of petitioner to suppress a lawsuit, violate the Americans with Disabilities Act

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED FOR THE COLORADO LEGAL SERVICES 1Defendants who have known about petitioner’s disabilities status, but he or she intentionally indifferent and exploited of impairment of petitioner on the purpose to suppress on lawsuit, and medical treatment is violation to the American with Disabilities Act? 2Defendants who have known petitioner’s disabilities status, have known petitioner is Asian; is under protected class, but defendants ignored that qualified and suppressed on lawsuit is violation to ADA, and 42 U.S.C. 1981? 3Pursuant to the Sec 504 Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) petitioner was qualified for receive an assistant from Federal assistant, but defendants intentionally denied for that benefit is violation to the Sec 504 Rehabilitation Act? 4Discrimination can be direct or indirect; petitioner was an Asian and a victimization of defendants’ violation; defendants with apparently evidences of violation to petitioner’s rights, but they’re American white and under protected by judges; were they’re in act of racial discrimination? 5Petitioner was injured and damaged with significantly evidences, but judges dismissed petitioner’s complaint without hearing and trial was violated to the Seventh and Fourteenth Amendment? QUESTION(S) PRESENTED FOR THE STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY et al 1-Petitioner in seriously injured, with long history of medical care, ongoing treatment, and permanently disabled cause by this accident. Complaint of petitioner is demanded for justice with significantly evidences; is this complaint justifiable or frivolous? 2Petitioner was suffering a seriously injured, but complaints of petitioner were dismissed without hearing and trial, were Judges and Courts in violation to 7" Amendment and 14" Amendment? 3Deprived petitioner’s Civil Rights had secured in 7" Amendment and 14" Amendment then imputed to petitioner’s complaints were frivolously? Was this an injustice? 4Exploited the impairment of disabilities litigant is violation to 42 U.S.C. 1981 (c)? . Defendant who were deprived the benefit of law, deprived the enjoyment of life of petitioner, and maltreated to petitioner in medical care, intend subject to like punishment and pains to petitioner is violation to 42 U.S.C. 1981(a)? 5Petitioner’s Civil Rights secured under 7" and 14 Amendment had been deprived by defendants; were they in violation to 42 U.S.C. 1983? 6Were the connivance among defendants on the purposed to disrupt treatment plan of petitioner? And they’re in violation to the 42 U.S.C. 1985? 7Were the actions to disrupt on treatment plan of petitioner can be preventing by an effort to bring the benefits to petitioner? And they’re in violation to 42 U.S.C. 1986? 8Were the connivance between Courts or Judges and State Farm Insurance Company counsel in the dismissed case 16cv02728 RBJ? COLORADO LEGAL SERVICES ‘ S