Preston Shands, Jr. v. South Carolina
DueProcess
As applied to Preston Shands, Jr., is South Carolina's kidnapping statute, S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-910, vague and overbroad, in violation of due process, because it did not put him on notice of what conduct is prohibited?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED | L | As applied to Preston Shands, Jr., is South Carolina’s kidnapping statute, S.C. Code Ann. | § 16-3-910, vague and overbroad, in violation of due process, because it did not put him on notice | of what conduct is prohibited? IL. Does Due Process confer a right for an accused to have a full and fair opportunity to respond to the prosecution’s best closing argument, meaning the State must open in full on the facts and the law and restrict its reply argument to matters raised by the defense in closing? Il. Did the South Carolina Court of Appeals correctly apply the comparative juror analysis under the third step of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986)? i | 1 |