Whether robbery under Connecticut General Statutes § 53a-133 categorically qualifies as a 'violent felony' under the force clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984 ('ACCA'), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether robbery under Connecticut General Statutes § 53a-133 categorically qualifies as a “violent felony” under the force clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984 (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B), even though Connecticut robbery is broader than Florida robbery, which was considered by this Court in Stokeling v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 544 (2019). II. Whether Mr. Shabazz’s case should be remanded to the District Court for a full resentencing of Mr. Shabazz as he stands before the Court today, see Pepper v. United States, 562 U.S. 476 (2011), rather than have his original sentence reinstated, which would include a mandatory five-year term of supervised release despite him already having served more than two-and-one-half years of supervised release. 1