Kenneth Taylor Curry v. Vancouver Housing Authority, et al.
DueProcess Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether a Vancouver Housing Authority Hearings Officer without original subject matter jurisdiction is ultra vires and failed to provide a Goldberg pre-termination hearing tailored to the plaintiff's needs
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4. A Vancouver Housing Authority Hearings Officer who is with out original subject matter jurisdiction is Ultra Vires and did not present ene Plaintiff, Housing Choice Voucher participant, a Goldberg pre+terthination hearing that is tailored to the circumstances of Plaintiff's needs based property interest? At the State of Washington, who is a violence threat is an original subject matter jurisdiction exclusively with in the criminal or civil province of the judiciary? . . 2. A Reasonable Accommodation Attorney who effect communication for the federal disabled Plaintiff is an essential nexus to Plaintiff having equal access to the Housing Choice Voucher program? Such a _ Said reasonable accommodation does not fundamentally alter the administration of the Housing Choice Voucher program by Defendants? 3. The common law implied mens rea element must be proven in all allegations of violence threats that are pending accusations when the decision at Anthony Doughlas Elonis, 575 US (2015) is handed down? . 4. Article VI, paragraph 2, includes the Supremacy Clause that preserves the disabled Plaintiff's right to object under 24 CFR 982.554 (b) (2) notwithstanding the color of state law at Vancouver Housing Authority equal to able persons whether at Seattle Housing Authority. 5. Vancouver Housing Authority Administrative Plan 3 III-cC purport a proscribed violence threat or threats on the property of another? It incorporates violence acts absent an enumerations Clause? Nonetheless its residual clause renders the regulation unconstitutional owing to vagueness? The categorical approach to an idealized offense fails to publish which conduct poses a risk? How does a notice at a public forum to sue at law or in equity per the substance of RCW 4.28.080 (16) (17) . for conduct outside the scope of an employment breach 24 CFR § 5.100 defining violence? As applied speech is chilled? An uncorroborated statement based on other than personal knowledge in the face of two persons who each have personal knowledge will not save VHA Admin. Plan 3 III-C? U.S. Constitution Amendments I and XIV, Section 1. 6. Financial needs based programs, including subsidized housing, shall apply a minimal due process federal Administrative Procedure Act . as the Bright Line Rule. Hearsay and multiple hearsay shall be limited a ~ ‘by and under the rule of the judiciary. US Constitution Amendments Vv. and XIV., Section 1. i