No. 19-5777
Donielle Rashi Ross v. United States
Tags: criminal-law domestic-violence legal-precedent mens-rea misdemeanor-crime physical-force recklessness recklessness-standard second-amendment statutory-interpretation supreme-court supreme-court-interpretation use-of-force voisine-v-united-states
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court's holding in Voisine v. United States extends beyond the definition of 'misdemeanor crime of violence'
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether this Court's holding in Voisine v. United States, _U.S..__,136 S.Ct. 2272 (2016), that recklessness is consistent with the “use of physical force” extends beyond the definition of “misdemeanor crime of violence” at issue in that case? ii PARTIES Donielle Rashi Ross is the Petitioner, who was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the Respondent, who was the plaintiff-appellee below. ili
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Donielle Rashi Ross
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent