Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a condition of supervision requiring the Petitioner to permit a probation officer to visit him at any time at home or elsewhere is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, constitutionally overbroad and vague, statutorily unreasonable, and a greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether this Court should grant review to consider whether a condition of supervision requiring the Petitioner to permit a probation officer to visit him at any time at home or elsewhere is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, constitutionally overbroad and vague, statutorily unreasonable, and a greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary? II. Whether this Court should grant certiorari, vacate the sentence and remand to the Fifth Circuit for reconsideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019)? ii
2020-02-18
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2020-01-29
Motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 46.2 filed by petitioner.
2020-01-22
Brief of respondent United States of America filed.
2019-12-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 22, 2020.
2019-12-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 23, 2019 to January 22, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-22
Response Requested. (Due December 23, 2019)
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-04
Memorandum of respondent United States of America filed.
2019-09-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 4, 2019.
2019-09-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 3, 2019 to November 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 3, 2019)