No. 19-601

Collabo Innovations, Inc. v. Sony Corporation, et al.

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-07
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (4)
Tags: 5th-amendment america-invents-act due-process inter-partes-review leahy-smith-america-invents-act patent retroactive-application retroactivity takings-clause
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Takings DueProcess FifthAmendment Trademark Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-06-18 (distributed 4 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the retroactive application of inter partes review to a patent that issued before the passage of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. No. 11-29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011), violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED When U.S. Patent No. 5,952,714 issued in September 1999, the Patent Act provided only two avenues for challenging the validity of the patent’s claims: ex parte reexamination and district court litigation. Shortly thereafter, Congress added a third method, inter partes reexamination, but deliberately chose to exclude older patents from the new proceeding. More than 10 years later, Congress replaced inter partes reexamination with a fundamentally different proceeding, inter partes review, and made it apply retroactively to all prior patents. The questions presented are as follows: 1. Does the retroactive application of inter partes review to a patent that issued before the passage of the Leahy—Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. No. 11-29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011), violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment? 2. Does the retroactive application of inter partes review to a patent that issued before the passage of the Leahy—Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. No. 11-29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011), violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment? $9

Docket Entries

2020-06-22
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-06-09
Rescheduled.
2020-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.
2020-06-02
Rescheduled.
2020-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-03-12
Rescheduled.
2020-02-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-24
Reply of petitioner Collabo Innovations Inc filed.
2020-02-07
Brief of respondent Sony Corporation in opposition filed.
2020-02-07
Brief of federal respondent in opposition filed.
2019-12-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 7, 2020, for all respondents.
2019-12-17
Motion of respondent Sony Corporation to extend the time to file a response from January 8, 2020 to February 7, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 8, 2020, for all respondents.
2019-12-04
Motion of the Solicitor General to extend the time to file a response from December 9, 2019 to January 8, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 9, 2019)

Attorneys

Andrei Iancu
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Collabo Innovations Inc
Patrick J. ConroyBragalone Conroy PC, Petitioner
Patrick J. ConroyBragalone Conroy PC, Petitioner
Sony Corporation
Andrew S. BaluchSmith Baluch LLP, Respondent
Andrew S. BaluchSmith Baluch LLP, Respondent