| 19-1031 |
Erin Capron, et al. v. Office of the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al. |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
cultural-exchange federal-preemption federal-regulations foreign-policy immigration labor-laws state-regulation |
Whether federal law preempts the application of state and local labor laws to the terms and conditions of participation in the federal au pair program… |
17.0 |
| 19-1009 |
Altera Corporation & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (5) |
administrative-procedure-act arm's-length-standard chevron-deference cost-sharing rulemaking stock-based-compensation tax tax-regulation tax-treaties treasury-department |
1. Whether the Treasury Department's regulation is arbitrary and capricious and thus invalid under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551 et s… |
15.5 |
| 19-924 |
Indiana v. Ernesto Ruiz |
Indiana |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
7th-circuit court-interpretation custodial-interrogation interview-context miranda-rights miranda-v-arizona police-station security-features station-layout |
When analyzing whether a station-house interview is a custodial interrogation under Miranda, do the ordinary security features and layout of a police … |
14.0 |
| 19-980 |
Ariana M. v. Humana Health Plan of Texas, Inc. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
attorney-fees beneficiary-rights civil-rights employee-benefits erisa fee-award health-plan judicial-review legal-success legal-victory standard-of-review |
The question presented is whether a beneficiary achieves "some success on the merits" for purposes of a fee award under ERISA Section 502(g)(1) when s… |
14.0 |
| 19-1051 |
Kansas v. Timothy C. Boettger |
Kansas |
Denied |
Amici (2)Relisted (3) |
civil-rights constitutional-protection criminal-law criminal-threats due-process first-amendment free-speech reckless-disregard standing state-law threat |
Does the First Amendment prohibit a State from criminalizing threats to commit violence communicated in reckless disregard of the risk of placing anot… |
13.5 |
| 19-1173 |
Comcast Corporation, et al. v. International Trade Commission, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
article-iii-courts comcast domestic-patent-infringement federal-circuit importation international-trade-commission international-trade-commission-itc mootness patent-infringement section-337 section-337-tariff-act statutory-interpretation vacatur |
1. Whether the Federal Circuit's judgment should be vacated as moot and remanded with instructions to vacate the Commission's orders, pursuant to Unit… |
13.5 |
| 19-1177 |
American Institute for International Steel, Inc., et al. v. United States, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
article-1-section-1 article-i-section-1 constitutional-challenge delegation-of-power federal-energy-administration-v-algonquin-sng legislative-authority nondelegation-doctrine presidential-discretion presidential-powers section-232 separation-of-powers tariff-imposition tariffs trade-expansion-act trade-expansion-act-of-1962 |
Is section 232 facially unconstitutional on the ground that it lacks any boundaries that confine the President's discretion to impose tariffs on impor… |
13.5 |
| 19-1062 |
CJ CheilJedang Corp., et al. v. International Trade Commission, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
claim-amendment doctrine-of-equivalents festo-corp-v-shoketsu innovation patent-infringement patent-law prosecution-history-estoppel public-notice public-notice-function tangential-relation |
Whether, to avoid prosecution history estoppel under Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., "the rationale underlying the amendment" mus… |
11.5 |
| 19-1134 |
Lonny E. Baley, et al. v. United States, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (6) |
endangered-species-act federal-agency federal-reserved-water-rights fifth-amendment mccarran-amendment reclamation-act state-law state-water-law tribal-rights water-rights |
Petitioners are a plaintiff class of Oregon and California farmers and ranchers who depend on their water rights in the Klamath River basin to irrigat… |
11.5 |
| 19-868 |
Aaron Miner, et al. v. Steven L. Picatti |
Idaho |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
42-U.S.C.-1983 42-usc-1983 civil-rights clearly-established-rights constitutional-rights excessive-force factual-disputes qualified-immunity summary-judgment |
In this excessive force case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the defendant officials (petitioners here) moved for summary judgment arguing that, on the facts … |
11.0 |
| 19-1008 |
Jim C. Hodge, et al. v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
|
but-for-causation causation causation-standard false-claims-act foreseeability fraud legal-elements proximate-cause substantial-factor |
Whether the causation element standard under the
False Claims Act is proximate cause, requiring both
that the harm was foreseeable and that the false
… |
10.5 |
| 19-1037 |
Sok Bun v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
|
circuit-split criminal-procedure detainers due-process interstate-agreement interstate-agreement-on-detainers legal-interpretation motion motions standing trial trial-court trial-motion |
Whether a defendant is "unable to stand trial" within the meaning of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, 18 U.S.C. App. 2, § 2, art. VI(a), when he… |
10.5 |
| 19-1222 |
Nathan Duckworth v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-asset-forfeiture civil-procedure constitutional-concerns controlled-substances-act due-process property-rights seizure-of-currency standing substantial-connection-test takings tenth-circuit |
Whether the government is required to show a substantial connection between money it has seized and an intended violation of the Controlled Substances… |
10.5 |
| 19-937 |
The Cherokee Nation v. David Bernhardt, Secretary of the Interior, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
|
appropriations-law implied-repeal indian-sovereignty indian-tribe interior-secretary land-trust regulatory-prohibition reservation-boundaries sovereignty statutory-authority treaty-rights |
1. Whether the Secretary of the Interior exceeded his statutory authority by taking land located within the reservation boundaries of one Indian Tribe… |
10.5 |
| 19-939 |
Stephen Gustus v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
|
circuit-split criminal-law diminished-capacity due-process intent-standard mens-rea postal-service-employee statutory-interpretation |
Whether 18 U.S.C. §111 is a specific-intent or general-intent offense. |
10.5 |
| 19-1256 |
Jennifer Mae Levin v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
Response Waived |
cause-of-death confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process dui-manslaughter expert-testimony medical-records sixth-amendment |
1. Whether – in a case involving the charge of DUI manslaughter – the prosecution can meets its burden of proving "cause of death" through the testimo… |
8.5 |
| 19-1074 |
Celgene Corporation v. Laura A. Peter, Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director, Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
administrative-review america-invents-act fifth-amendment inter-partes-review lucas-test patent-rights patent-rights-takings patent-trial-and-appeal-board patents penn-central-test property-rights takings takings-clause |
Whether retroactive application of inter partes review to patents issued before passage of the America Invents Act violates the Takings Clause of the … |
7.5 |
| 19-601 |
Collabo Innovations, Inc. v. Sony Corporation, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (4) |
5th-amendment america-invents-act due-process inter-partes-review leahy-smith-america-invents-act patent retroactive-application retroactivity takings-clause |
1. Does the retroactive application of inter partes review to a patent that issued before the passage of the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. … |
7.0 |
| 19-1001 |
Noble Cooper, et al. v. Officer Oliver Flaig, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (7) |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process excessive-force law-enforcement police-accountability qualified-immunity |
Should the Court eliminate or significantly revise the judicially created doctrine of qualified immunity to protect the people's core constitutional r… |
6.5 |
| 19-1097 |
Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Company, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
aia burden-of-proof due-process inter-partes-review patent patent-validity retroactive-legislation retroactivity takings vested-rights |
Does the application of inter partes review to a patent that issued before the enactment of the AIA violate the Due Process Clause because it retroact… |
6.0 |
| 19-1153 |
Russell A. Suzuki, et al. v. Christopher Deedy |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
28-usc-1257 appellate-review civil-procedure criminal-procedure double-jeopardy exxon-mobil-v-saudi-basic federal-court-jurisdiction federal-jurisdiction lesser-included-offense lesser-included-offenses standing state-court-judgment state-court-judgments |
This case presents two straightforward questions:
1) the limits the Constitution and Congress impose on
the jurisdiction of lower federal courts; and … |
5.5 |
| 19-1216 |
Loredana Elizabeth Botofan-Miller v. Brett Robert Miller |
Oregon |
Denied |
|
birth-mother child-custody civil-rights custody due-process fourteenth-amendment legal-custody parental-rights state-courts state-intervention |
Did the State of Oregon courts violate the fourteenth amendment rights of the full legal custodial parent, who was the birth mother, to make decisions… |
5.5 |
| 19-1224 |
Jeremiah F. Manning v. Lucy J. Kim |
California |
Denied |
|
campaign-contribution campaign-contributions disclosure due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment judicial-ethics recusal |
I. The public record shows that Judge Susan Greenberg of the California Superior Court of San Mateo County accepted campaign contributions from Respon… |
5.5 |
| 19-1229 |
Edward Lee Mulcahy v. Aspen Skiing Company |
Colorado |
Denied |
|
1st-amendment colorado-constitution constitutional-rights first-amendment free-speech national-labor-relations-act public-lands retaliation ski-lift unionization |
1. Is the banning from ski lift operations on public
lands during Plaintiffs distribution of a
unionization flyer promoting a living wage a
violati… |
5.5 |
| 19-1232 |
Todd C. Bank v. Al Johnson’s Swedish Restaurant & Butik, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure civil-rights disparagement first-amendment lanham-act matal-v-tam standing trademark trademark-law trademark-registration |
1. In Matal v. Tam , 137 S. Ct. 1744 (2017), this Court
held that the disparagement clause of Section 2(a) of
the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a), whi… |
5.5 |
| 19-1233 |
Robert Doyle v. Douglas Palmer, Clerk, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
|
bar-admission civil-rights delegation-of-power due-process federal-court federal-courts first-amendment free-speech freedom-of-association freedom-of-conscience judicial-branch judicial-delegation legislative-power standing |
1. Whether Congress may delegate, to the Judicial Branch, the power to enact federal-court bar admission requirements that Congress lacks the power to… |
5.5 |
| 19-1235 |
Brian Hampton Clark v. Virginia |
Virginia |
Denied |
|
constitutional-rights contempt-of-court due-process federal-courts fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment judicial-bias judicial-recusal recusal state-courts writ-of-prohibition |
The petitioner, Brian Hampton Clark ("Brian Clark") seeks reversal of a conviction of contempt of court entered by the Honorable David V. Williams, ch… |
5.5 |
| 19-1237 |
LeRoy K. Wheeler v. North Dakota, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
|
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-access court-access due-process judicial-bias judicial-review legal-prejudice meritorious-claims prisoner-rights pro-se pro-se-prisoner |
Do poor pro-se prisoners have a constitutional right to access the courts and to justice that will compel courts to rule on the merits of valid consti… |
5.5 |
| 19-1243 |
Arthur O. Armstrong v. Wilson County, North Carolina, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
|
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights court-access due-process equal-protection federal-procedure fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment frivolous-complaint official-discrimination standing |
1. Did trial court deprive the petitioner of his constitutional rights when he denied petitioner total access to the court when he denied the petition… |
5.5 |
| 19M143 |
Alberto Rojas, Jr. v. Ann Gail Meinster, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19M144 |
Julius Sesztak, et ux. v. Great Northern Insurance Co., Inc., et al. |
New Jersey |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19M145 |
In Re Linda Ann Wright |
|
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19M146 |
In Re Linda Ann Wright |
|
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19M147 |
Josh Albritton v. Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19-955 |
Shirley Hirshauer v. AQ Holdings, LLC, et al. |
Maryland |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
bias bias-in-judiciary civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fraudulent-conveyance judicial-immunity plain-error-rule standing |
1. Was Shirley Hirshauer's, and her sons, Constitutional Right to Due Process violated?
Is a judge immune from being sued when he acts in the absence… |
4.0 |
| 19-1020 |
Florence Bikundi v. United States |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response Waived |
burden-of-proof continuance district-court-discretion due-process ends-of-justice ends-of-justice-continuance forfeiture fraud fraud-conduct restitution sentencing sentencing-guidelines speedy-trial-act |
1. Whether a district court granting an ends-ofjustice continuance under the Speedy Trial Act of
1974, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), violates the require… |
3.5 |
| 19-1230 |
Bobby Knight v. Chenega Security, Inc., et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights contract-law dismissal due-process evidence motion-to-dismiss pro-se-litigation qui-tam qui-tam-action standard-of-review standing whistleblower-protection |
I. DID THE COURT BELOW FAIL TO USE AN
APPROPRIATE STANDARD OF REVIEW
WHEN GRANTING ALL THE DISMISSAL
MOTIONS WITHOUT RECOGNIZING THE
PETITIONER 'S… |
3.5 |
| 19-1262 |
Steven Eric Greer v. Dennis Mehiel, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights constitutional-rights final-policymaking-authority first-amendment government-entity government-liability monell monell-claim monell-v-department-of-social-services petition press probable-cause retaliation retaliation-claim rule-60-motion |
The Lozman question
Did the lower courts misapprehend, then ignore completely on appeal, Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Fla., 13 8 S. Ct. 1945 (201… |
3.5 |
| 19-1266 |
H. B., a Minor, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Michelle Lee Shirley, By and Through His Guardian ad Litem, Ronnie Shirley v. City of Torrance, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
4th-amendment civil-rights excessive-force fourth-amendment objective-reasonableness police-conduct qualified-immunity scott-v-harris summary-judgment use-of-force |
In a 42 USC § 1983 action where videos capturing the claimed use of excessive force are open to multiple interpretations as to whether the use of leth… |
3.5 |
| 19-1313 |
Donovan Dave Dixon v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
controlled-substances controlled-substances-act criminal-liability drug-trafficking gonzalez-v-oregon medical-malpractice medical-practice mens-rea standard-of-care |
Whether juries must be instructed that the government must prove that a physician acted with the mens rea of intent as to issuing a prescription outsi… |
3.5 |
| 19-8000 |
James Robert Peterson v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
courts-of-appeals-split criminal-procedure detainer-act federal-state-courts interstate-agreement interstate-agreement-on-detainers-act motion-tolling speedy-trial-act time-to-trial tolling |
Does a pending motion automatically toll the IADA's time-to-trial clock, to the same extent as under the STA? |
0.5 |
| 19-7794 |
Jeremy Shane Fogleman v. Mississippi |
Mississippi |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
burden-of-proof civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment |
1) Does the SUPREME COURT of the STATE of MISSISSIPPI'S DECISION REVERSING the COURT Of APPEALS of the STATE Of MISSISSIPPI'S, 9-0 UNANIMOUS DECISION … |
0.0 |
| 19-7834 |
Travis Soto v. Ohio |
Ohio |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
criminal-procedure federal-courts fifth-amendment finality plea-bargaining constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy federal-courts fifth-amendment finality jury-trial plea-agreement plea-bargaining |
This Court has yet to resolve the question lying at the core of this appeal, which has produced a split amongst this country's federal and state judic… |
0.0 |
| 19-7382 |
Tyrone Jemane Johnson v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
aggravated-assault criminal-law federal-jurisdiction force-clause mens-rea sentencing-guidelines uniformity |
I. Whether a generic aggravated assault as defined in United States Sentencing Guidelines § 4B1.2 requires a mens rea greater than mere recklessness, … |
-1.0 |
| 19-8365 |
Arthur Lopez v. California |
California |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment free-speech habeas-corpus judicial-review standing |
Question not identified. |
-1.5 |
| 19-8510 |
Juan Carlos Garcia Torres v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law due-process immigration-court immigration-law jurisdiction noncitizen notice-to-appear removal-proceedings |
Whether an immigration court has jurisdiction to commence removal proceedings against a noncitizen if the "notice to appear" at the removal hearing fa… |
-1.5 |
| 19-8513 |
Edward Javier Catano Lopez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
drug-trafficking due-process extraterritorial-jurisdiction international-law maritime-drug-law maritime-law pinkerton-doctrine subject-matter-jurisdiction |
1. For purposes of the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act ("MDLEA"),
does due process require a nexus between the defendant and the United
States where… |
-1.5 |
| 19-7544 |
Robert M. Waggy v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2)IFP |
constitutional-law content-based content-based-restrictions criminal-law due-process first-amendment free-speech public-concern speech-regulation telephone-harassment |
Whether a statute that prohibits telephone harassment may, consistent with the First Amendment, prohibit speech on matters of public concern or impose… |
-2.5 |
| 18-9554 |
In Re Billie J. Allen |
|
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
alabama-v-shelton arizona-v-fulminante capital-case capital-punishment due-process gideon-v-wainwright habeas-corpus mccoy-v-louisiana non-capital-case right-to-counsel structural-error |
1. Whether McCoy V Louisiana, 138 S. Ct. 1500 (2018) is a new "watershed rule", akin to Gideon v Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), which falls within t… |
-4.0 |
| 19-7310 |
Michael Charles Smith v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
confession-voluntariness criminal-procedure due-process involuntary-confession medication-effects medication-impairment mental-capacity narcotic-medication physical-condition psychological-coercion voluntariness |
At the time the critical statements were made the mind of the accused was insuffientlr clear and hampered by the combination of his Phrsical condition… |
-4.0 |
| 19-7405 |
Francienna B. Grant v. Marshall L. Williams |
New Jersey |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights damages-denial due-process evidence ex-parte-evidence judicial-fairness legal-malpractice pro-se pro-se-litigation standing |
Whether a Pro Se litigant can prevail in a Legal malpractice case on liability after having suffered damages and be denied damages incurred.
Whether … |
-4.0 |
| 19-7461 |
Derrick Lamar Cheeks v. Alford Joyner |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process habeas habeas-review jurisdictional-conflict procedural-default state-court supreme-court supreme-court-precedent |
1) Has the Supreme Court of the United States overturned its own precedent in Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255 109 S.Ct. 1038 103 L.Ed. 2d (1989); Caldwel… |
-4.0 |
| 19-7260 |
Darin Kaufmann v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
18-usc-2252 categorical-approach child-pornography federal-criminal-law first-amendment predicate-offense prior-conviction sentencing-enhancement state-law statutory-interpretation |
1. Did the Seventh Circuit err in holding that the categorical approach does not apply when determining whether a state conviction triggers a sentenci… |
-4.5 |
| 19-7699 |
Anthony Carr v. Mississippi |
Mississippi |
Denied |
IFP |
adaptive-functioning atkins atkins-standard criminal-sentencing diagnostic-criteria due-process intellectual-disability medical-expert-criteria medical-experts supreme-court supreme-court-interpretation |
Did the Mississippi Supreme Court establish an erroneous legal standard when medical experts"? |
-4.5 |
| 19-7743 |
Robert Paul Langley, Jr. v. Oregon |
Oregon |
Denied |
IFP |
appointment-of-counsel attorney criminal-procedure marion-county-circuit-court oregon-supreme-court state-court-procedure breakdown-in-communication criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel indigent-defendant right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 19-7865 |
Clifford Laverne Mecham, Jr. v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
2nd-circuit 8th-circuit child-pornography circuit-split constitutional-law eighth-circuit first-amendment free-speech morphed-images second-circuit sexually-explicit-conduct |
Whether the First Amendment protects morphed child pornography created without any child's involvement in sexually explicit conduct, as the Eighth Cir… |
-4.5 |
| 19-7991 |
Oscar Garcia v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
article-iii-judge constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-magistrates-act guilty-plea magistrate-judge rule-11 |
Whether or not a magistrate judge can fully and finally accept a felony guilty plea with the defendant's consent such that it cannot be withdrawn for … |
-4.5 |
| 19-8229 |
Donnie L. Harris, Jr. v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
IFP |
capital-punishment due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment newly-discovered-evidence statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation |
Does Oklahoma's strict application of its statutory requirement that all newly discovered evidence in capital cases must be presented within one year … |
-4.5 |
| 19-8272 |
Nicholas Cody Tate v. Benjamin Ford, Warden |
Georgia |
Denied |
IFP |
aedpa aedpa-review capital-sentencing habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mitigation-evidence schriro-v-landrigan strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
Whether the Georgia Supreme Court's opinion reversing the state habeas corpus court's reasoned grant of relief based on capital sentencing counsel's p… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8276 |
In Re Levar Lee Anthony Spence |
|
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rule-60 court-of-appeals district-court federal-rules-of-civil-procedure jurisdiction notice-of-appeal petit-rule |
1. Whether the district Court should have filed the Petition filed pursuant to Civil Rule 60 petition as a notice of appeal in the Court of appeals?
… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8278 |
In Re Levar Lee Anthony Spence |
|
Denied |
IFP |
brady-violation due-process exculpatory-evidence fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment sixth-amendment spoliation spoliation-of-evidence writ-of-mandamus |
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit properly refused review and hearing of a "Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendm… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8281 |
Luqman Abdullah v. New Jersey |
New Jersey |
Denied |
IFP |
4th-amendment delayed-notification federalism fourth-amendment new-jersey patriot-act separation-of-powers sneak-and-peek surveillance-procedure tenth-amendment |
Whether the enhanced surveillance procedure, under Section 213 of the U.S. Patriot Act, 18 U.S.C , §3301 (Commonly known as "Sneak and Peek " or the "… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8283 |
James L. Toney v. Heath Dickson, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process standing |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 19-8289 |
Jose Yeyille v. Cecilia M. Altonaga, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure dismissal district-court-review due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment in-forma-pauperis jury-trial seventh-amendment standing |
1. Whether the district court appropriately resolved genuine issues of disputed facts; correctly applied legal conclusions; and provided any statement… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8292 |
Russell Tinsley v. Sherry Yates, Administrator, Adult Diagnostic and Treatment Center, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
certificate-of-appealability civil-commitment constitutional-law constitutional-provisions due-process fauntleroy-doctrine full-faith-and-credit jurisdiction |
WHEATHER THE NEW JERSEY CIVIL COMMITMENT OF MR. TINSLEY WAS A VIOLATION OF THE FAUNTLEROY DOCTRINE; AND/OR JURISDICTION OF THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT C… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8298 |
David M. Kissi v. United States District Court for the District of Maryland |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process fbi fbi-warrant fourth-amendment hearsay hearsay-evidence miranda-rights search-and-seizure |
Whether the trial court overlooked evidence that the FBI had Petitioner arrested and searched his home with writs that were inadmissible because they … |
-4.5 |
| 19-8299 |
Matthan James Simons Pattioay v. Hawaii |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction standing |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 19-8303 |
Wadress Metoyer, Jr. v. Delynn Fudge, in Her Individual and Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process liberty-interest parole parole-eligibility sentencing-guidelines sentencing-range truth-in-sentencing |
Did the 1997 Oklahoma Legislature mandate in its statutory language, phrases provisions, design, purpose and intent in House Bill 1213 effective date … |
-4.5 |
| 19-8306 |
Marcel Nwagu v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure collateral-review habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel procedural-default rule-60-motion standard-of-review |
1. Whether, in this case, under the authorities of Martinez, Trevino and Ayestas, Petitioner is entitled to Rule 60 (b) (6) relief due to the alleged … |
-4.5 |
| 19-8307 |
Jose Lopez v. Rollin Cook, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction |
Connecticut |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-liberties civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process evidence evidence-tampering habeas-corpus judicial-misconduct |
1) The State Superior court At Rockville sent me A letter stating that thay have misplaced the or some of the valuable evidece that I have provided at… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8309 |
Cynthia Fisher v. Frontline National |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure fourth-amendment search-and-seizure standing |
Why did the NC Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit state that I was late filing, after the appeals' court accepted my extension request? That is why … |
-4.5 |
| 19-8313 |
Thomas M. Tully v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence constitutional-claim habeas-corpus miscarriage-of-justice procedural-default statutory-provisions successive-writ supreme-court-precedent writ-of-certiorari |
In McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 393 (2013), the United States Supreme Court ruled: "a prisoner otherwise subject to defenses of abuse or succes… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8314 |
Reginald Ward v. Scott Crow, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence circumstantial-evidence constitutional-provisions constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process forensic-evidence jurisdiction self-defense statutory-interpretation |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 19-8320 |
Quintez Talley v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment civil-rights due-process eighth-amendment excessive-fines federal-claims pleading-standards prisoner-rights pro-se-plaintiff state-law-claims supplemental-jurisdiction |
1. Is a Parties right to raise an absolute a/identiam. PYimleae tontaent UP0Y1 Whether bY evidence ?
2. bots -the. doctrine thaba district Court must… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8321 |
Charlie Ray Carney v. Virginia |
Virginia |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment constitutional-rights court-records due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment sentencing state-courts |
WHETHER A STATE PRISONER'S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS, SECURED BY THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AND MADE OBLIGATORY TO THE STATES T… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8323 |
William George Coodey v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
IFP |
consent criminal-procedure dna-evidence dna-testing due-process factual-innocence jackson-v-virginia rape sixth-amendment |
1. Whether DNA testing that would undermine an alleged rape victim's testimony denying consent to sexual intercourse would create sufficient uncertain… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8324 |
James William Hornsby v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
adversarial-process brain-injury constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-assistance right-to-counsel sixth-amendment strickland-v-washington |
(1) Whether the district courts denial of relief and determination
of whether a breakdown in the adversarial process was created
by the trial courts … |
-4.5 |
| 19-8327 |
Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi v. Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Dismissed |
IFP |
case-processing certificate-of-appealability civil-rights court-of-appeals discretionary-power due-process habeas-corpus judicial-discretion judicial-review jurisdiction legal-procedure standing |
Whether a Certificate of Appealability should issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) when the United States Court of Appeals, in a decision dated Septembe… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8331 |
Jose A. Rodriguez v. Thomas Griffin, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-error constructive-amendment criminal-procedure due-process felony-offense grand-jury indictment ineffective-assistance penal-law right-to-counsel |
1. Whether the State Court constructively amended the indictment which charged petitioner on September 1, 2009 through September 1, 2010, before the N… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8343 |
Kenan Allen v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights due-process equitable-tolling federal-review habeas-corpus state-court-notification statutory-limitation |
Whether a "Certificate of Appealability" should have been issued regarding the matter of conduct during Mr. Allen's filing of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 pet… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8575 |
In Re Andrew Robinson |
|
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment access-to-courts civil-procedure constitutional-rights court-access due-process equal-protection equitable-tolling habeas-corpus jurisdiction-claims |
1) . Does State and Federal law allow jurisdiction claims to be made at anytime?
2) . Does Sate and Federal law say jurisdiction claims go under habe… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8578 |
In Re Khayree Smith |
|
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-jurisdiction denationalization due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction nationality racial-classification slave-nomenclature status status-correction |
A) WHat branch 6f law authorized States to assume jurisdiction over any person prior to adjudication?
B) What branch of law authorized states to viol… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6961 |
Hernan Navarro v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights district-court due-process equitable-relief evidence evidentiary-proceedings intellectual-predicate judicial-review precedent precedent-analysis standing statutory-interpretation |
fordamenton error of equitable sharispr tence by evaluating the Detitoners
WS Under an erroneous Stendo revi Me tn &&
B0id Claimg being unFarnly rejec… |
-6.0 |
| 19-7349 |
Angel Osornio v. Supreme Court of the United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment administrative-law civil-rights due-process equal-protection fair-trial impartial-tribunal judicial-review standing |
Dwhy am I a lake
Staks Chan ic
het bee protecte
under the constifthn?
2
the Wrino Staks?
Worl
ere my
e th a
the
dunt fake the menty of
anπ
casl
h
Se… |
-6.0 |
| 19-7576 |
James Anthony Davis v. Angleton Independent School District, et al. |
Texas |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure due-process government-interference necessary-parties property-rights res-judicata taking-clause takings tax-assessment |
1. Whether the Petitioner could be liable for the 2012 taxes as he was not the property owner on January 01,2012.
2. Whether the government's interfe… |
-6.0 |
| 19-7597 |
Robert William Wazney v. Kenneth Nelson, Warden |
Fourth Circuit |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
asset-forfeiture asset-freezing constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-process pre-trial-restraint state-corrective-process |
IS PETITIONER, ROBERT WILLIAM WAZNEY, IMPRISONED IN VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES? |
-6.0 |
| 19-7749 |
Andrey L. Bridges v. David W. Gray, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment 6th-amendment 8th-amendment actual-innocence constitutional-amendments due-process equal-protection factual-innocence habeas-corpus habeas-review res-judicata strickland-v-washington |
I: Does the State affirmative defense of Res Judicata defeats Amendment Fifth; Sixth; Eighth, and Fourteenth of the United States Constitution?
II: I… |
-6.0 |
| 19-8037 |
Shlomit Ruttkamp v. Bank of New York Mellon, fka The Bank of New York |
Connecticut |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-procedure civil-rights due-process foreclosure foreclosure-litigation fourteenth-amendment fraud fraud-allegations jurisdiction standing subject-matter-jurisdiction |
The Second Circuit Court Justice should reminisce whether in the 21st Century the rules of law and the books of law should be compromised and violated… |
-6.0 |
| 19-8148 |
Brent Douglas Cole v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights double-jeopardy due-process jurisdiction prosecutorial-misconduct separation-of-powers sovereignty standing territorial-jurisdiction venue |
A "Case" is "a suit instituted according to the regular course of judicial procedure." Muskrat, 219 US at 356-7. It must be instituted lawfully to ari… |
-6.0 |
| 19-8288 |
Mac Truong, et al. v. R. Kenneth Barnard, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
341(a)-meeting asset-collection bankruptcy-law bankruptcy-procedure chapter-7 chapter-7-trustee creditor-meeting debtor-rights discharge discharge-denial trustee |
1. May a Chapter 7 Trustee proceed to collect a Chapter 7 Debtor 's assets before
the Debtor would have successfully attended at least one 11 USC 341… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8360 |
Juan C. Parra-Interian v. Mike Obenland |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-error criminal-procedure due-process evidence exculpatory-evidence harmless-error joinder-of-charges probable-cause standing witness witness-testimony |
Is it lawful to have a witness testify in a case where they have NO Direct knowledge of the facts?
Can a State Court Joinder of Dissimilar charges, w… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8369 |
LaLangie Hoskins v. GE Aviation |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
ada-title-i americans-with-disabilities-act disability disability-discrimination due-process employment-discrimination employment-law protected-class standing trial-procedure wrongful-termination |
Whether the district court abused its discretion by relying on the erroneous legal premise that the Plaintiff is not part of the protected class of ci… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8394 |
Paul Anthony Hatton v. Douglas L. Combs, Justice, Supreme Court of Oklahoma, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
42-usc-1983 appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process federal-jurisdiction free-speech judicial-enforcement standing state-court-rules state-supreme-court subject-matter-jurisdiction |
WHETHER THE FEDERAL COURTS HAVE AN AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO EXERCISE THEIR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION TO HEAR A 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ACTION SEEKING TO HAVE A … |
-6.5 |
| 19-8404 |
Jamaal Gittens v. Elizabeth Kelly, Judge, Court of Common Pleas of Pennsylvania, Erie County, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection free-speech standing |
Pursuant to Pa CSA 4342(e) 42 U.S 666 Common Pleas judge Kelly, Domestic Relations has authority to obtain personal jurisdiction over non residence of… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8445 |
Freddie Lee Curry, aka King of da Hood, aka Rat v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
21-usc-841 alleyne alleyne-ruling criminal-procedure drug-quantity fair-sentencing-act first-step-act mandatory-minimum sentence-reduction sentencing statutory-interpretation |
Did the District Court abused its discretion when it failed to to apply Alleyne to Appellant's sentence reduction under Section 404(b) of the First St… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8459 |
Todd Erling Becker v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure copyright-infringement damages fair-use intellectual-property substantial-similarity |
Whether there was probable cause to arrest Mr. Becker for the Florida burglary and robbery crime.
2. Did the FBI agent impliedly threaten Mr. Becker … |
-6.5 |
| 19-8474 |
Brittany Dawn Thomas v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-3553(e) 18-USC-3553e criminal-procedure district-court judicial-authority mandatory-minimum sentencing sentencing-discretion separation-of-powers statutory-interpretation |
i. DOES A DISTRICT COURTS INABILITY TO DEPART BELOW A MANDATORY MINIMUM UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e), FOR ANY FACTOR OTHER THAN DEFENDANT'S SUBSTANTIAL A… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8477 |
Timothy Martin Kendrick v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment civil-rights confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process free-speech judicial-interpretation sixth-amendment standing |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 19-8503 |
Darieus Malik Williams v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administration-of-justice criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court fact-intensive-inquiry federal-criminal-cases fifth-circuit prostitution-enhancement review-standard sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review |
On Appeal DARIEUS MALIK WILLIAMS challenged the district court's finding that he unduly influenced a minor to engage in prohibited sexual conduct such… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8504 |
Jose Antonio Garcia v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
admission-of-guilt constitutional-law criminal-procedure disposition-agreement due-process judicial-discretion plea-bargaining sentencing supervised-release |
Whether Mr. Garcia's admission to a violation of supervised release in this matter violated due process where the district court failed to clearly inf… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8506 |
David James Ward v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
4th-amendment civil-rights due-process qualified-immunity search-and-seizure standing |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 19-8508 |
Javier Villar v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
4th-amendment criminal-procedure exclusionary-rule managerial-role motion-to-suppress probable-cause search-and-seizure sentencing-enhancement standing u-s-sentencing-guidelines |
(1) Whether the District Court and the
Court of Appeals erred in denying the
Defendant's motion to suppress evidence
located in the Appellant's reside… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8509 |
Joaquin Gonzales v. California |
California |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
alpr automated-license-plate-reader evidence-standard fourth-amendment license-plate physical-movements reasonable-expectation-of-privacy reasonable-expectation-privacy search-and-seizure warrantless-search |
Did a detective's warrantless search of an ALPR database for images and locations of Petitioner's license plate violate petitioner's Fourth Amendment … |
-6.5 |
| 19-8512 |
Alexander P. Mhlanga v. Jennifer Hicks |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment 4th-amendment civil-rights damages due-process qualified-immunity |
I -DID DEFENDANT VIOLATE PLAINTIFF'S RIANTS UNDEL THE FOURTH TIOKETS UNDER COCOR OF LAW AND COST PEAINTIFF TWO SEPARATE ARRESTS
2-DD ERENDANT DEPRIVE… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8515 |
Michael Munday v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
disparate-sentencing double-jeopardy due-process fairness fifth-amendment judicial-review reasonableness sentencing sentencing-disparity sixth-amendment |
In affirming the 12-year upward departure sentence, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of ju… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8530 |
Sacorey L. Clark v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-process government-duty government-liability judicial-remand legal-claims rehaif rehaif-precedent remand sentencing sentencing-review |
Whether CLARK's Affirmed Sentence & Judgment Must be Vacated in light of REHAIF, 139 S.Ct. 2191 (2019), Then Remanded, Where it is Warranted that CLAR… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8535 |
Courtney Rashon Johnson v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-violations criminal-procedure due-process eleventh-circuit federal-review grand-jury habeas-corpus plea-bargaining standing |
1.)
THE 11+CnCUIT conCEDES
thAT JOhUSON SObSTANtiAl RinTS WERE NOT
3tAtOS ElEMENT ANd dENiEd JOHnSON RELEf. BUt ON thE othER hANd thE 4+
CIRCUt COnCED… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8537 |
Susan Xiao-Ping Su v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-procedure criminal-procedure district-court due-process judicial-jurisdiction jurisdiction legal-remedy procedural-error sentencing |
A. whether the Ninth Ciruit should sue sponte vacate or grant
Conviction/sentence becanse ind: ctment alleged certificuateont
of statnte scope aleordi… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8540 |
Antwoyn Spencer and Derrick Jerome Spencer v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process fifth-amendment first-step-act resentencing statutory-interpretation |
Whether Petitioners are being deprived of their right to due process of law against law (without due process of law) in violation of the Fifth Amendme… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8543 |
Carl L. Burdick v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-3553 advisory-guidelines criminal-procedure judicial-discretion plea-agreement rita-v-united-states sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-range united-states-v-booker |
Whether the District Court, contrary to precedents of this Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, accorded the advisory … |
-6.5 |
| 19-8544 |
Hubert Carter v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
armed-career-criminal-act criminal-procedure judicial-determination jury-trial sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation |
Does the judicial determination of crimes "committed on occasions different from one another" at sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8546 |
Annamalai Annamalai and Parvathi Sivanadiyan v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bank-fraud constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency federal-jurisdiction judicial-error new-trial procedural-misconduct prosecutorial-misconduct |
A. whether the Eleventh circui+ court of Appeals has so
Far departed from the accepted and usual course of
Judicial pvoceedings and/ox sanctioned Such… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8548 |
Shawndell Lee Harrison v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split collateral-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure federal-sentencing habeas-corpus johnson-v-united-states retroactive-rule retroactivity sentencing |
A second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct a federal sentence may be filed if it "contain[s] . . . a new rule of constitutional la… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8558 |
David Hardman v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion Anders-review appeal-waiver breach-of-plea-agreement criminal-procedure jurisdiction |
DID THE CIRCUIT COURT ERR IN REFUSING TO MAKE A DETERMINATION OF THE VALIDITY OF THE APPEAL WAIVER DURING A REVIEW OF THE RECORD, PURSUANT TO ANDERS v… |
-6.5 |