Whether the petitioner was unlawfully denied due process and equal protection under the 14th Amendment when the state court proceedings failed to provide a fair and impartial tribunal to adjudicate the petitioner's claims

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | On in Ja had ShkS Cuan ofthe nid) 4) of Anica | > hot yer Sin uaker thy pensidta! | GY Wry howe T be lurked ad\ erst \ tntine syeeks toned MA, am my day pad) oD fey pom hees = cf | ies bar Llyn ye Fhe ic fe bat\ hue | no fufter't Via dea Neher oat, non rad r iNOS. “ed Serlarsi\. t ™ He “) ot eke he nurs of 2 my Anak hey have of cproceeded) Loy n cronne| qranvekon! DNW 5 Lee? | oe Const a erimd, (10 tk OF% “a Ct } ok \s Desire fst fu ref hein thos of (0 ro " sor lank Go Coropt! (D Whin > Sn-fnn do wreaks Rit 7 | Y All parties a1 LIST OF 0 alee __. in the e PARTIES : ° if. i to the tappeat _ tthe cs | \ Jn Z 1S ce ful the caption .. the cover 9) hk, alt, 7 Vedic 4 ent is the subje : eB t (9) (oh subi Ali he ee 2 . 6 a ls . ee of : frog fret He ata 7 6 in 6 elatE; ae wh oh('c chal! 6¢ kts} bay Ino \ Cong bal’ Que o\ te ip 57 oder (lo eer fl Lo le ai" ye (ed m “ye (9 of { WSS “) 5 [. che Ly (| ave wna ‘athnen tal D4 rn yh » wll 6 oat ON dica newt feed ® formos sonar Ck ° a QS) sabe [Fae aa OF tow hee ah OC al ebal” S | Skaln“ (et ai" ecu? ae ‘ Go) He del Petra oe yim idee! (eal as Vien fin | els eA : apels 4 ab Bbte ebal , _ tly él 7