Whether the New Jersey civil commitment of Mr. Tinsley was a violation of the Fauntleroy doctrine and/or jurisdiction of the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution (Art. IV, Sec. 1), to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's jurisdiction

QUESTIONS PRESENTED POINT 1 WHEATHER THE NEW JERSEY CIVIL COMMITMENT OF MR. TINSLEY WAS A VIOLATION OF THE FAUNTLEROY DOCTRINE; AND/OR JURISDICTION OF THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION (ART. IV, SEC. 1), TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA’S JURISDICTION. POINT 2 WHETHER THE LOWER COURTS ERRED AND ABUSED ITS DISCRETION FOR DENYING MR. TINSLEY’S REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. moe ea