No. 19-955
Shirley Hirshauer v. AQ Holdings, LLC, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: bias bias-in-judiciary civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fraudulent-conveyance judicial-immunity plain-error-rule standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-06-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Shirley Hirshaver's, and her sons, Constitutional Right to Due Process violated?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Was Shirley Hirshaver’s, and her sons, Constitutional Right to Due Process violated? 2. . tsa judge immune from being sued when he acts in the absence of all jurisdiction? 3. Is the Maryland Fraudulent Conveyance Rule 15-209 Unconstitutional? 4, Was it unlawful for Judge Sweeney to dismiss Hirshauer’s counterclaim when she had merit and the defendant's to the counterclaim offered to defense? 5. Does the Plain Error Rule, Harmful Error | . Rule and Reversible Error Rule pertain : to this case? 6. Were Judge Ross and Judge Sweeney ; biased triers? | (i) :
Docket Entries
2020-06-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-06-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-04-23
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent Judge Thomas Ross to respond filed.
2020-02-11
Waiver of right of respondent Brooke Schumm, III to respond filed.
2020-02-10
Waiver of right of respondent AQ Holdings, LLC to respond filed.
2019-09-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 2, 2020)
Attorneys
AQ Holdings, LLC
Brooke Schumm, III
Judge Thomas Ross
Elise Balkin Ice — Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Respondent
Elise Balkin Ice — Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Respondent