No. 19-8503
Darieus Malik Williams v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administration-of-justice criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court fact-intensive-inquiry federal-criminal-cases fifth-circuit prostitution-enhancement review-standard sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-06-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Fifth Circuit's cursory review of the district court's record lead to an illegal, unreasonable sentence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is as follows: Did the Fifth Circuit's cursory review of the district court’s record lead to an illegal, unreasonable sentence. Because the application of the plain standard of review is of exceptional importance to the administration of justice in federal criminal cases, this Court should grant certiorari in this case to decide this question and, and upon review, should reverse the judgment of the Fifth Circuit. |
Docket Entries
2020-06-22
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-05-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-05-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 19, 2020)
Attorneys
Darieus Williams
Yolanda Evette Jarmon — Law Office of Yolanda Jarmon, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent