Whether the party seeking to raise the possessory evidence privilege has an absolute evidentiary privilege

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Is a Parties vialittp Vase an absolute evidentiana Prouileae Content Lipov) \Whether pv rot the Partu. Seeinia to vaise tt Possossesthe eldente % Z.boes the doctrine thaca district court must decline exercisina Surelernental jurisdiction Over a Pridoners state law claims when: te. federal claime have been dismissed winlative of the Eiahth | Anuendinerks Proseriedion addins the Imposition OF EXCeSSWe fines? % Does the doctrine that a diatrich court must decline exercisina . auipPlemental Aurladiction Over a Prisoners State law Claims \dhen the Sedeval claims have beer dismissed substantiallA derart from this Coures Prior holdina that such a decision Should bo based Lien “Walues of \udicial economnA ,Conventence fairness, and cornu”? A To 9 debit courts dismisaal of a PYo Se Plaintiff's Come|aint at the Seveenina. Phase-for falluve-to state a Claim without leave 4 amend 4 substantial deracture Fromthes Courts decision in NetaKe v. \hiliames andlor Rule (5 (a(d(B) of the Federal Rules of Cuil Procedure?