Whether the defendant violated the plaintiff's constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment and Equal Protection Clause

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED _ ; . ae eT 20. Fe FounTA j~ Min NesEn aan? ul etATE PenentiFF'S RlawTs ua bet 7 ese DEFENDANT 19s0Eh THE Amen MENT IN Tires CAE an pe wht BEFENLANT 187 PeeETS UNbER CocoR oF Chto ANA Lest Pear Th To SEPMATE — peResrs ? | gedin RElenban? pEParve Pemn Trelis Cone Ty Tear QGNTS BY Vemma Peat FFls Abuse oF He RemvAt oF HALITUAL DERN DEE STATUS ON DEcemBER 4,201 on FAwuahy 23, 2osr7's AkAT Avis : . AOLeSr en PLINTH FoR HABITUAL MDTEA YE rece OFFEWAER? . Hie ee 3-Was Ne Rev danT NEGLIGENT WHEN SHE FoLboT To WeITE ON THE SELINDN LITATION THEKET MATEN JAwusky 27, 2017 FAINT IP WAS | . ConheLared | with FE Tawuary 23, 2017's jNtiDENP pometH COs Prmurrtl a sé eon Aekeg7 ? _ a ge Bim Pantie nave LEGAL Phobcters on PorEkly M7VA TAA NS NE AT Some Pont THAT Pemniek NEED APPOINTED CDUASES AND &bw DEFENDANT UIDLATE Prana Fl!s E6070 Améenwbm en 7 Ann Equa PeoTeeTOn btsusé oF TE UMTS Saree beNsTiT UTE FRAT Pema erat deseevis ManeTary Danrges BAe on PemnTi Fh’ Ss