No. 19-8544
Hubert Carter v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act criminal-procedure judicial-determination jury-trial sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-06-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the judicial determination of crimes 'committed on occasions different from one another' at sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) violate the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the judicial determination of crimes “committed on occasions different from one another” at sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) violate the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial? i
Docket Entries
2020-06-22
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-06-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-05-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 26, 2020)
Attorneys
Hubert Carter
Stephen Carl Moss — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Stephen Carl Moss — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent