Was due process followed per the Connecticut constitution?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) The State Superior court At Rockville sent me A letter stating : that thay have misplaced the or some of the valuable evidece that I have provided at the habeas trial hearing for my claim of inno: . cence. @ 2 2) At the hearing of providing copys of the evidense lost,the Stax "tes attorney together with the judge Honr.,John B.Farley.refused to accept the copys, falsely claiming that I added information. : # 3) At the habeas trial I was able to proof beyond reasonable of tHe though.But the states Attorney with the judge Hon. ,John B. Farley.attempted to,or on misleading my person to fot any longer . claiming my innocence without any merit,then to avoiding on makin« g a verdict by claiming that the evidence spoke for themself so Hon.,John B.Farley .decided on dismissing the case. IT am asking the Supreme court of The United States, to allow me a Fair and Just Do Process,as it is reqmire by our Country constitution and civil liverty allow us as citizen of our great country the great UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Due to these three(3).facts the question that is born is,,Was : due process followed per the connecticut constitution? I believe the answer to be (NO"! and I'm asking the court to assist in correcting the rights that have been violated. Question to the above three(3) Statements 1) Do to the Court losing the evidence .4te this act enough grounds toask for a case overturn'd or case diss? 2) Do to the fack that the Judge together with the State Attorney . teefustdg the copys.According to the constitution,.Why was the Court allow to ignore part of the Constitution Do Process and Violate it? 3) After proving my innocence beyond resonable of though,according to the Constitution.Why is the Judge together with the States Attorney allowd to refuse to make a proper verdict so that the Court wont compromise themself with the Entity that pays or sign's their paycheck,as an act of Contempt to Court?