Did the 1997 Oklahoma Legislature mandate in its statutory language, phrases provisions, design, purpose and intent in House Bill 1213 effective date July 1, 1997-98, to the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board (PPB) pursuant to the provisions and procedures mandated in Oklahoma 's Truth-In-Sentencing Act/Laws in Title 57 O.S. Supp. 1997-2018, § 332.7 and its subsections (A) (1) (B) (1) (2) 1997 version and subsections (A) (1) (F) (G) and (0) 2018 version in House Bill 2286, effective date November 1, in its context as a whole for offenders crimes committed prior to July 1, 1998, the replacement of its discretionary parole consideration review to a mandatory realistic opportunity to be release on a parole through an indeterminate sentencing range determination of what sentence pursuant to Section 6, 598, 599, 600 and 601, Chapter 133 O.S. L. (1997) he/she would have received pursuant to the applicable matrix. See, Title 57, O.S. Supp. 2018, § 332.7 (A) (1) (B) (F) and (0) effective date November 1, 2018 in its statutory provisions, language, design purpose, intent and context as a whole pursuant to the Oklahoma applicable matrix-indeterminate sentencing and release through a supervised parole and/or a discharge of sentence by accumulated earned credits established by Title 57 O.S. § 138?

2. Did the statutory language, design, purpose and intent in House Bill 1213 effective date July 1, 1997 and House Bill 2286 effective date July 1, 1997 and House Bill 2286 effective date November 1, 2018 for an offender 's crimes committed prior to July 1, 1998 create and mandate a truth-in-sentencing act/laws providing a meaningful and realistic opportunity to release by a determination of what sentence they would have received pursuant to the applicable matrix pursuant to Section 6, 598, 599, 600 and 601, Chapter 133 O.S.L. (1997)-indeterminate sentencing range-sentencing guidelines providing a control sentencing and release by the PPB recommendation to the governor of the state of Oklahoma pursuant to Oklahoma 's contract agreement and requirements set-forth in 42 U.S.C A § 1370 (1) (B) (2) (3) and § 13704 (a) (i) (A) (C) (i)?

3. Did the Oklahoma truth-in-sentencing act/laws pursuant to title 57, O.S. Supp. 1998-2018 § 332.7 (A) (1) (F) (G) and (O) effective date November 1, 2018 create a constitutional protected liberty interest right in its statutory provisions and language, as presented in its statutory design, purpose and intent to a mandatory procedure to be implemented, applied and administered to offenders crimes committed prior to July 1, 1998 upon their one-third (1/3) parole eligibility date, in providing a mandatory indeterminate sentencing range system for the PPB to recommend a sentencing and release by a supervised control parole release and/or discharge by accumulated earned credits (57 O.S. § 138), if the

Did the Oklahoma legislature mandate a truth-in-sentencing act to provide a meaningful opportunity for parole release