Whether the district court appropriately resolved genuine issues of disputed facts; correctly applied legal conclusions; and provided any statement explaining its dismissal of the Complaint that would facilitate any remotely 'intelligent appellate review'

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the district court appropriately resolved genuine issues of disputed facts; correctly applied legal conclusions; and provided any statement explaining its dismissal of the Complaint that would facilitate any remotely ““‘intelligent appellate review”””. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 34 (1992). 2. Whether the summary disposition by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal of Petitioner’s Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis and Fed. R. App. P. 24(a) (5) is justified under Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962), Cruz v. Hauck, 404 U.S. 59 (1971), and Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989). 3. Whether district court judge Beth Bloom violated Petitioner’s Equal Protection rights protected by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. | 4. Whether district court judge Beth Bloom violated Petitioner’s right to a Jury Trial protected by the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.