No. 19-8327
Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi v. Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.
IFP
Tags: case-processing certificate-of-appealability civil-rights court-of-appeals discretionary-power due-process habeas-corpus judicial-discretion judicial-review jurisdiction legal-procedure standing
Latest Conference:
2020-06-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court should have granted a Certificate of Appealability
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I Whether mr not, CotiPeate of A ealahi |) » Cortih ppe sbi should had. b ee by the. District Court, when the. of Appeal, ith Reveille eet ti? Cxse on, Septinber 27, 2017, for a Ode ? Cnlewwtered in the Court of Appeals, Fina| erty \. Repstel for a CoA, when the Dishick Court bas St (See, Cre Rule 20-| G))? | 3, Whelhe or wet, Court of Appeals, exceeded is Turis cliction Of the Recedumal Requirements of Issuance af a COA?
Docket Entries
2020-06-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2020-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-04-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 21, 2020)
Attorneys
Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi
Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi — Petitioner
Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi — Petitioner