No. 19-8327
Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi v. Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.
IFP
Tags: case-processing certificate-of-appealability civil-rights court-of-appeals discretionary-power due-process habeas-corpus judicial-discretion judicial-review jurisdiction legal-procedure standing
Latest Conference:
2020-06-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a Certificate of Appealability should issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) when the United States Court of Appeals, in a decision dated September 2010, found no constitutional error in the Court of Appeals' decision, and whether the Court of Appeals abused its discretion under Fed. R. App. P. 22 and 28 U.S.C. § 2253 in denying issuance of a Certificate of Appealability?
Whether the Court of Appeals exceeded its jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in issuing an order denying a Certificate of Appealability?
What error or...
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court should have granted a Certificate of Appealability
Docket Entries
2020-06-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2020-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-04-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 21, 2020)
Attorneys
Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi
Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi — Petitioner