Juan C. Parra-Interian v. Mike Obenland
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Question not identified
No question identified. : : Case No. __ : _ . CONSTITUICNAL QUESTIONS , Constituional question: 1. ; ; ; Is it lawful to have a witness testify in a case where they have NO Direct . knowledge of the facts? : : ' Constituional question: 2. Can a State Court use Joinder of Dissimilar charges, where Acts alleged are ; ; significantly different from the original set of facts? Constituional question: 3. , o : : A> Court abuses its discretion when its ruling is based on an erroneous view of . the law, or on a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence. ‘ : therefore, Can a Court allow witness, or victims to testify to different ; facts in seperate cases, where witness was NOT "witness thereto! ? ae Constituional Question: 4. : , It is considered "Harmless Error" to convict a person while failing to ~ consider Exculpatoty evidence that can exonerate him?) / a © Constituional question: 5. ; ‘ cS . a Was it Constitutional Error to Deny admission of Defendants witness's : Affidavit & Declaration, which could exonerate Defendant ? _ Constituional Question: 6. Was it Harmless Errore to omit Defendant's witnesses Affidavit from Jury : _ consideration ? : : Pe of ‘ . Case NO z . Lot ‘ ‘ ; . . CONSTITUICNAL QUESTICNS Constituional question: 7. ; Ss : Under State Law, can a witness be both, “Awake and half asleep'' for the. purpose of finding of guilt, or probable cause ? ; Constituional Cuestion: 8. ' . Was joinder-of the dissimilar offenses proper ? ~ ; : n Constitutional Question: 9. ‘ : Was there insufficient evidence to convict the Defendant as pertains to the Solicitation & Conspiracy charges ? ‘ : ‘ ; Constituional question: 10. ; N . \ \ 7 ‘ a u