No. 19-8360

Juan C. Parra-Interian v. Mike Obenland

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-04-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-error criminal-procedure due-process evidence exculpatory-evidence harmless-error joinder-of-charges probable-cause standing witness witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-06-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : : Case No. __ : _ . CONSTITUICNAL QUESTIONS , Constituional question: 1. ; ; ; Is it lawful to have a witness testify in a case where they have NO Direct . knowledge of the facts? : : ' Constituional question: 2. Can a State Court use Joinder of Dissimilar charges, where Acts alleged are ; ; significantly different from the original set of facts? Constituional question: 3. , o : : A> Court abuses its discretion when its ruling is based on an erroneous view of . the law, or on a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence. ‘ : therefore, Can a Court allow witness, or victims to testify to different ; facts in seperate cases, where witness was NOT "witness thereto! ? ae Constituional Question: 4. : , It is considered "Harmless Error" to convict a person while failing to ~ consider Exculpatoty evidence that can exonerate him?) / a © Constituional question: 5. ; ‘ cS . a Was it Constitutional Error to Deny admission of Defendants witness's : Affidavit & Declaration, which could exonerate Defendant ? _ Constituional Question: 6. Was it Harmless Errore to omit Defendant's witnesses Affidavit from Jury : _ consideration ? : : Pe of ‘ . Case NO z . Lot ‘ ‘ ; . . CONSTITUICNAL QUESTICNS Constituional question: 7. ; Ss : Under State Law, can a witness be both, “Awake and half asleep'' for the. purpose of finding of guilt, or probable cause ? ; Constituional Cuestion: 8. ' . Was joinder-of the dissimilar offenses proper ? ~ ; : n Constitutional Question: 9. ‘ : Was there insufficient evidence to convict the Defendant as pertains to the Solicitation & Conspiracy charges ? ‘ : ‘ ; Constituional question: 10. ; N . \ \ 7 ‘ a u

Docket Entries

2020-06-22
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-05-26
Waiver of right of respondent Mike Obenland to respond filed.
2020-04-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 26, 2020)

Attorneys

Juan C. Parra-Interian
Juan C. Parra-Interian — Petitioner
Juan C. Parra-Interian — Petitioner
Mike Obenland
Peter Benjamin GonickAttorney General of Washington, Respondent
Peter Benjamin GonickAttorney General of Washington, Respondent