Whether the petitioner's proceedings below violated his constitutional rights

No question identified. : | ; i / | lhe Dew geet 3, a 4 Ke inevebntade. winlelef on ang yor ue the petlaess Proceedans Lovk fie: tore poste Coruetlion prow? | quark adle ene Ups % a4 orhide denying anoite op g deg weg | That tilntiel Dog Chat that ayoles to the ame sentiiee Lael | ; Es an Lorerduird (BA ( “ous MWOUS 2 fg. dusted) Aen % Pie Due ; ; . ; ry a, : id ; y fn p) | . C The Chiat Aegasding tpeplhea tier > Ticgy ued alhtiteig ae ; | 9 Z “Of 5 Lick the envreeredl terigunt of phat 2 doled cf gonlinun (bd Med by. | ge gpl al ootoig i in Me. Sabiicy apypbicaine, yyplted h ptledeercrs feeddbine bwel P i , b.\ Wasnt Umendmenit PA adeutied lo the pthc DEUS Mis Bo Le : fevatst pret tensile Aehisd ho Alen Ueolent offades aiid Legpease tM C poble ° . | P| Len P, Fuak Sho lect Lured th 2. aelinad Ain wielert tg splabes she We. olay “snbpiacce9\ Lb Yue am avrols dhesenfi prancheenint ong a a Lorin , aa an aor A Privahomend Mguding puliliness depeatid dewalt fon pot dg unclean, Ading 9 Le Me Kicletton. Cause Atguiement yrgbeted haw: he: | pute jige? 7 7 if Duel He pie wadele Ue 3 endnert hen ate (poll 2b iu a dy east 13 Lyne Ke fume dinitiecTeanes pies y querting bneugh, Z en | ; the sug Lay Zhe yt be) Sy i aa as UW detsig Feat? a ge 7) | | | C , , Queslime Preserited (Cort) . Ht.\ Cla the 4 prevent wm mitbung A Wlbeahl, pudgement | (| Oik lous crcl ait 2 iil oom Mb Wire there tnedtimen tot Vial Hat apouried Ahibealen inlet | Cag pang alice pear G09 ORG AAG ti patina: ! epregenilien Hel wislaled jlendard 4 Athuendhlentas ? ; | 4. lhte He “ebutheal’ CLawese. . Lee, ta Q0tlee sad ceocler p21 v4 . 19) (Ln Pegs) Wil thes Oust egterssse austhet: Emedih, pun Chatye; “Pp fPUepRoAr ; He 4 j ptis , due 29 peliliawer a pout : Connection aby fmt Larrpereet e ; 4 | | Lat of Fada | |B UE pratless cpypen) un. He Celine f Ae Ctse | —* | Lukes Ste v Tayler, 8 2d 248, 244, (4A; aue)eites USSB, | | | Sige G Erends F2¢ 79 at CY-FY, b-¥9) | | Loutid Stiles Vv. Pogue, A Cope, 772, 774 C=C: Z0W) S | uated Sil 0 Corb, B90 E21 Yed, 468 G*Li. 2012 guctg | _ | Gut Stale. « Vayler, 619 Fd H, 9 CO*Li 2000) — "| neki Sale v. bs, 78 Kid 750, 759 (O™ Cis, 2013) | butial Stila v. Howse, IY FB GMb, 960 BE Gi, 208 metry _ z that Aferdanle lide fa, A COAL fonder eoacnliicly Lavemngae the | ot Unled Slile v. Fosell€ A, Siler MWe] 204 WL |1S219 7A, , at’Bn.| (ED. Ky Gopil 8 2019) ot C lated Fears Cth) * Uniti Slate v. Mhseman, 98% FI Wt, WF C6%G;, 249) pueden fo Cbicorare pred 1619-9341 (dS fan. 12, 2020) © | Unileel Sales ¥. Convo, 2020 US. DIT LEXIS /4L4?, Glen 24, 200) | ot [dhe Sti v. Kine, 704 Fed ged. IB lag, 29, 119°C; ) * indiel Slates vo Mere , 2020 Us DUT Lens Yea (Gao. (3090) Cc ° United Sele v. les, UB FRA USS Ug, 4, Dorr) _ *\Gaske v Usted Sills, 2012 Us Dut Léus 228027 (Nay 32017 . | °| Miueeda. V. Usted State DIR US DEE Levis 203741 (fal 23,2012) | (Unltd Stile v. Eashe, 3008 US Dist ens 135041 (Feb. 19, 2009) sok galt thone tab sy OG ra : Dorsey U Lbnilecl Silée, 40} US 260, 2b, 305 Cf 239), | 133 Lid. ol. 250 (2010) * | Llegne Vv Uniti Stillen, E905 US Gp LENS O58, 1385.4 B15) 63, 1% L.&d. 2a 3 Cela} | : lam bright , D0 Fel at 1025 | | ° Barfoot V Gila, WR US_ 880, 293 04, 103 5. 3393, | 793 LEAL Ja, 10% (i493) } | “| Schane v! londugan, 550 US Ub5, 423, [27 S.C#. 1933, | Ib? Lig. Qa 33 (2002) . | "| us Couat of Uppeals, 732 F.3d S62; 2013 US. Gig. LEXUS 25604, Dd | No, U-49A2,, ngusd (Oot: 5; 2012), Filed (Deo. 2, 2013)(3 0.x) | *| Eichenlaub vi oomokip of reine, 35 ES 224, 993,(3% C02 004) (citations onitled) : "| Court Lpeole 357% 3d 4iA; 2004 US lp LEXIS 19% Na oi-9500 , ) P yn 2 | ie ("lay 1, 9003), TDecsatect (un. 38, S00¥)C4"* C4.) 4 8] Slimlin vi Untied State, 503 US 26, 42, 193 LiEd, bd 54g, IB SCE 113 (443) (duet Weis vi United Slo, G03 US 192, 201, NE L€ol Je BY), Nd. S-Ch INR (saa), £357 E34 4853 | United State v. Headwick, 963 Fol 773, 731 (5°. 442) o . C ; Related Craex (lent) — ‘a , | | | _ C ; | | OMS Belts. a A . — [aRishicrod e