No. 19-8546

Annamalai Annamalai and Parvathi Sivanadiyan v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-05-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bank-fraud constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency federal-jurisdiction judicial-error new-trial procedural-misconduct prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-06-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

issues-being-raised

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ~ ww Fan. dhe farted. ~rom the accep +e And USMAL Cairvse of Tlic ial Prcc3eedingS and/or 6amcriontd Such fe Pareave bY F&C ai. Fer on exer ese of Fhis courte S SUPvemnr[Sexyy¥. : SE tee RT | I. The panel has committed an obvious error concerning the facts conclusively . . established, pursuant to Fed.R.Civi.P.36(b), concerning Sivanadiyan's ! property and Annamalat's Liberty interests. oes coe 1 II. The Panel has made an obvious error in calculation of 70 'non-excludable' 5 days of the indictment concerning Annamalai. eee a III, The Panel has made an error by misunderstanding the judicial facts surrounding . : egregious misconduct of government's agent Mr.Stephan Langamandel. concerning a ‘. referral to treasury Inspector General for Tax administration ( TIGTA ),... 6 ‘ IV. The Panel has made an error by denying Annamalai's request to dismiss the . bank fraud indictment, as if Annamalat is raising the ' insufficient of evidence‘ to suport his conviction of bank fraud,. and such erroneous decison shall be vacated to stop and prevent the ‘fundamental miscarriage of justice’ and the . ‘continuing prejudice'., — 09 oe et A. ANNAMALAT's conviction on bank Fraud counts 1-8 are tainted by lack of Federally insured victims, and also ‘Tack of federal jurisdiction’, hence based on the binding precdents of this circuit, those counts shall be vacated and dismissed... tee wee 7 Y. The panel has made an obvious error in, by not noticing that, the Appellee has | ‘tacitly acquiescesed' to various claims of the ‘appellants’, and as a matter : of law, the appellants’ are entitled to relief on such tacitly agreed claims. 31. VI. Annamalai at Teast deserves a new trial on the balance 12 counts. 12 FINAL MERCY PLEA. eee eeaee 13

Docket Entries

2020-06-22
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-06-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-04-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 26, 2020)

Attorneys

Annamalai Annamalai, et al.
Annamalai Annamalai — Petitioner
Annamalai Annamalai — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent