Annamalai Annamalai and Parvathi Sivanadiyan v. United States
DueProcess Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
issues-being-raised
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ~ ww Fan. dhe farted. ~rom the accep +e And USMAL Cairvse of Tlic ial Prcc3eedingS and/or 6amcriontd Such fe Pareave bY F&C ai. Fer on exer ese of Fhis courte S SUPvemnr[Sexyy¥. : SE tee RT | I. The panel has committed an obvious error concerning the facts conclusively . . established, pursuant to Fed.R.Civi.P.36(b), concerning Sivanadiyan's ! property and Annamalat's Liberty interests. oes coe 1 II. The Panel has made an obvious error in calculation of 70 'non-excludable' 5 days of the indictment concerning Annamalai. eee a III, The Panel has made an error by misunderstanding the judicial facts surrounding . : egregious misconduct of government's agent Mr.Stephan Langamandel. concerning a ‘. referral to treasury Inspector General for Tax administration ( TIGTA ),... 6 ‘ IV. The Panel has made an error by denying Annamalai's request to dismiss the . bank fraud indictment, as if Annamalat is raising the ' insufficient of evidence‘ to suport his conviction of bank fraud,. and such erroneous decison shall be vacated to stop and prevent the ‘fundamental miscarriage of justice’ and the . ‘continuing prejudice'., — 09 oe et A. ANNAMALAT's conviction on bank Fraud counts 1-8 are tainted by lack of Federally insured victims, and also ‘Tack of federal jurisdiction’, hence based on the binding precdents of this circuit, those counts shall be vacated and dismissed... tee wee 7 Y. The panel has made an obvious error in, by not noticing that, the Appellee has | ‘tacitly acquiescesed' to various claims of the ‘appellants’, and as a matter : of law, the appellants’ are entitled to relief on such tacitly agreed claims. 31. VI. Annamalai at Teast deserves a new trial on the balance 12 counts. 12 FINAL MERCY PLEA. eee eeaee 13