No. 19-7794

Jeremy Shane Fogleman v. Mississippi

Lower Court: Mississippi
Docketed: 2020-02-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: burden-of-proof civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-06-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi's 5-4 decision violate the petitioner's rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : (yes the Suseme (hear of fhe Sari: of Mocs 1001's, 5-4 Screen a —_ Keversin the COMT OF AGAS of Me SIA of Miseucsmen's, 9-0 : _ UNAVMous Decsion) in Th with the D : ee | Wet of the LMA STATES 7 2) CN A fudye OOD(aVATL af) mishmont or _penaHty Aad upon _ votive puchual fact fiachng Suth 95 Aoteymining a hone Violent Crime to bt aerial of islence., oF Mast rt Le Suburttee fo Gfaty aad earth Clowent be found beyond 4 feesmnaLb doubt? 5.) Does The Sutheme (dues of the. TATE MIS Ste 14s, 5-4 SALT GEC ON) MOLATE The PETIT) OES NlghtS UA he Siv7W tnd FoukTeentu = Amenauanas of the Lrten S7ATes Cust iiciaw anel also Qbes (Truth afoul of AULEWE v. Uren Samet, 570 US. 99,103,152 SCANS), H&L Ld Ad 3/4 113) amang otlar LIN Te ATES Seem (ue Leas os P ee oo an L.S7.oF Pagties 7 Tipe eee Msn _ PO Boxc49 ; a on, ML 325-09 9 : (tase | | Se oeltsiis01 Atmeney Cava | Z _ PO UA oe aco, MSU sss‘“‘“‘(C;‘;S;!O bW 1359 HE Hovokaee ROGER T, CLAR GULLIT. ) ; Fea Mi GHD ] Hetty, Mice Diszencr Aron a | DO Bue (12D : | | TK Te be ola = Dating beeen, hes =e tA Sa Soin, Sea Din ed, 9-75 TB _ Bud thir Ee eT 6) 77 7 1 < — aor Appel TK Mss noo norens 7-3 «BB By ANION fee uc if “poms 17177 rT | / . SEPTEMBER. 18, BOI — 7 C: He Penance HCA, (werorfems FL CAEAMIS-KA-OS4G-(0A JANUARY del AOI , D: QROBCOLANT V6 WUT OFLECTIDRAR) EY (RCT DE [VLS/ PE) oe AEs LOI-CI-OIIA-SI Arki.4, 2019 E: OPINION oF Te Suakeme eer Oe Mies y _ CASESION-A TOS i _ Aust I019 ! Ff: Qpaat Penns av op law “oF MAME Il — OAEIBCT-RGST 00 |) GG: aon ce a ee 7 Fl ee ERM-CT-O1J9E-SCT a _OTOnER 1,019 _ | _ oe a __ ee ALD INTE, 51019, 5,488, 53 BRB SA SIEL BEL. Ef ASD) Se Gog) Ras = DUM LUA, BUSS (6B) _ Me WINSHIP, 5970S. 558, A970) I7 oe = APN) v NEW IEREY, S SOUS HEF LOO) (Bd Ay POLE LOCKRIDGE, STON AT, SSI IO = RAKE Vv. WAGICTON, SEIU. 2%, 30-03 0d 4 = Rilo. ARIZONA, SUS. S84, C09, IBIS, JB, 04 | 1. El LASSE (009) | | = WESTIE. Bo ROOK SB TS A SE a Heath as wa __ 4.738, [b0L. td. 1 (oh SOF BSB MEL Ed. Sel B56 (ID ) ST v MTT, SETS 3 B46, IASCEU ERLE A IB CMT) —_ = RON TCE. SSEUS. 160. 70, WHT, Fl. BAT _ 1 td. at STV — ee read a mk 7 TNT STIS. SUES WE. Bae _ “W40b, [SsL ed SR) —=— UTED STA Sv. HAYMOND, [398 GIS, BB. MAT . ROGL Ed. dl BFT(A0IF . AMEE TOES WDE. SIS. KN, IT “TBS. [81a Hol. Edad SO UPB) D5 C7189 MOL.t. ad SSO)” ” i = Mi (Lv MALAMA, SE7US 440, F77, ISAS.C 30 . ASS, [BS Led dd GD7 (08) _ oe SHAE TOUS, WEY Aa & TE ME. LM, R= Ow...30... . OLE —= CWE v RENARD, 374 PA 1b 1, 116E (kin, Wh) 30 oe a 2 ros orton ee a Coutt OPINIONS in THICASE hav oe OO uate CITATION AH OS HA a a The OP do # PME (MUA Tot The STALE on CEPTIAE!: — a —= Fin anny v Gare. a0/d Miu. Laas 303, 2014 os 4071866, Decided pw. : Autos 9, 20/9-—= = Foaeum) v Srare 376 So. 2d (8 (Mics : ~~ = The TUPUSLTCTION of His CONT 1 INVOKED vateter BUSS AST Ca __ te SUPCEME (DNC oP Me LATE oF MALE OLOPP] on. Aucust J? 2ueT of ABEDLS on WRIT OETELTIORARI: . Z _ ' A Cony of afiresaic! DECISION ayponte at APPEMIIXE ! aa __A Peirmow for Reem was pot filed per Misrcssoes Kuwes of APLATE ocenuce. Vor Hes Gn dpeh vation tor OcTeN Yonat [oe bo Enz been Aled ! a __CONSTITUTIOVAtwel STATUTORY ! == SatuAwaumevr oF He COLSTON ot fhe TED STATES, USI | = In all Cominal prosecutions, He accel slallonjsy. ~ Nyb-) to a Spordy arc public Arial, lay on uportal ji oF tia Sate and Gh strict where the Cre Shal/ have Ascertaiied by Mtw, ard to be tafrywecl ot the Ahta/e ad : "aus of the Dicusation; to be Comtintid wrth fhe littne.cx¢ attest hunj To have Comtoulrary for dtadning wirtaesses Ine oe Mts favor, od 1h have he Assettenee = Fowereznts Aneniomenor of fhe CATION LMT SES, TIS B68 = hedin TAT pets brin afraid | Late Yates ancl Subject fo Yhe pltcdiction (hereof? ane dizer of the United Sats at of fhe ite lofoyein Thy resale. Nb State oe ili a rl ty a a ab aes — : _. Wmeug ties OF CyTicens oF He Pe Ley al Ly Sitedplwe —_ Ady Piso oF Ue, Liheg Df LlaperTyp, WNTMMLT le PYVILLL OF Thy Ad = Mpssysiite Cone Porn § 77-79-78)

Docket Entries

2020-06-22
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-05-29
Reply of petitioner Jeremy Shane Fogleman filed.
2020-05-15
Brief of respondent Mississippi in opposition filed.
2020-04-15
Brief amici curiae of the Due Process Institute and the National Association for Public Defense filed.
2020-04-07
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Jeremy Shane Fogleman
2020-03-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 15, 2020.
2020-03-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 15, 2020 to May 15, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-03-16
Response Requested. (Due April 15, 2020)
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-03-09
Waiver of right of respondent Mississippi to respond filed.
2019-11-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 30, 2020)

Attorneys

Jeremy Shane Fogleman
Nicolas Luis MartinezBartlit Beck LLP, Petitioner
Jreemy Shane Fogleman
Jeremy Shane Fogleman — Petitioner
Mississippi
Abbie Eason KoonceOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
the Due Process Institute and the National Association for Public Defense
Kendall Kelly Alexis TurnerO'Melveny & Myers, Amicus